Rappey
Well-known member
I was just suggesting that comparing an outboard leg to a sail drive leg is not really the same as the outboard is only immersed when in use rather than living underwater.
Utter tosh. A real sailor wouldn't have an engine, far less a shaft. What's wrong with a sculling oar?The problem is that you don't find saildrives in older boats, so they must be the work of the devil - inferior/more expensive/less reliable/too complicated*. As we all know, yacht design peaked somewhere around 1970, just before the infernal saildrive was invented - I mean, the stupidity of effectively sticking an outboard engine leg through the hull of a boat is there for all to see and it was obvious from the beginning it would never catch on - consigned to history in 1980 I believe. They are also totally unsuitable for seaworthy, proper, long-keel designs with skeg hung rudders on the trailing edge of the keel - the ONLY way to build a blue-water boat!!!
* delete as prejudice dictates.
Only the bit below the diaphragm is immersed ...
The bubble-wrap is a nice touch!It could be that the balance has shifted and the factories and suppliers producing gearboxes and parts for shaft drive are down on numbers - so the components are being sold at a discount to the yacht manufacturers, or the investment costs have been amortised making the parts cheaper - happens in automotive all the time.
I really don't care if my boat is shaft or saildrive - both work with pros and cons and I'd happily own either - not something that would swing my decision one way or another.
My boat got a shiny new re-power a few years ago and it went in very easily and hasn't had any post-installation problems at all ...
View attachment 99330View attachment 99331