Biggles Wader
Well-Known Member
Just read the report.
If the enquiry's finding is indeed the cause, then surely there must have been an unquantified period "of flooding" - so why no distress call in that period?
I always understood it was catastrophic failure at frame 65 (?) so the ship broke in two and sank like a stone.
I am only going by accounts and have no specialist knowledge of these matters.
That was the working assumption for many years but was apparently disproved when they found the wreck. For some reason it appears the No1 hatch cover was breached and the ship would have gone down very quickly after that. The exact hows and whys of that are probably open to interpretation.