michael_w
Well-Known Member
Wouldn't it be more cost effective giving the children swimming lessons?
Like any big business, the RNLI needs to constantly expand to increase its profits.
Nope. It's supposed to be a charity.
None of the money contributed in this country for the RNLI is used for their international work. As a RNLI volunteer I have been to a meeting this afternoon where it as explained to us
As a long time contributor to the RNLI I must confess to a twinge of anxiety at learning about their expansion into overseas activities. The direct expenditure so far may be small and self-funding to an extent, but will it remain thus? In business life there are many examples of companies which had developed a successful business model in their home country, only to fall apart when they tried to expand into other countries.
Re the RNLI, I think there is a very good case for them to sell kit to other countries. They have spent more time and £££ on R&D than most and have developed some excellent specialist rescue craft. And training people how best to use the kit is another worthwhile "export". But what can the RNLI realistically tell an Indian Ocean country (which is where the biggest concentration of drownings occur) about how to cope with the monsoon? What experience do they bring to the table? Or are they just showing that we have a superior civilisation?
I suppose that leads to the question - where does the money come from for international activities?
They're both - They have a charity side and a corporate side which is not part of the charity.
I find that worrying. The word Charity is splashed about in their website with no mention of a corporate/commercial side other than payment for beach lifeguards which I assumed was a charitable payment.
I wonder if the 'corporate' side gives all it's profits to the charity?
They're both - They have a charity side and a corporate side which is not part of the charity.
I know, I was very surprised when I was told when visiting Poole HQ. The hotel/training centre is corporate and is not part of the registered charity - I believe the charity then pays to use it. I have no idea as to whether the corporate side then donates back to the charity, didn't ask...
The two types of activity are separated for very good legal reasons as the "commercial" activities do not enjoy charitable status, for example being VAT registered. The surplus from these activities is automatically "donated" to the charity.
Nothing unusual or suspect about this, other charities that raise money through commercial activities as opposed to donations operate in this way, as do all universities for example.
Not wishing to open up any arguments about VAT, but to be VAT registered is an asset to large companies as they can recoup certain tax paid. Do not know if Charities can register for VAT but seems to me that if they can its an advantage to then financially, and a disadvantage to them if they cannot
The two types of activity are separated for very good legal reasons as the "commercial" activities do not enjoy charitable status, for example being VAT registered. The surplus from these activities is automatically "donated" to the charity.
From the RNLI website
The Royal National Lifeboat Institution is a charity registered in England and Wales (209603) and Scotland (SC037736). Charity number CHY 2678 in the Republic of Ireland | RNLI (Trading) Ltd - 1073377, RNLI (Sales) Ltd - 2202240, RNLI (Enterprises) Ltd - 1784500 and RNLI College Ltd - 7705470 are all companies registered in England and Wales at West Quay Road, Poole BH15 1HZ
I'm surprised that the charity doesn't seem also to be a company, but perhaps the Royal Charter under which it operates fulfils the same purpose.