roaringgirl
Well-Known Member
On 19 strand wire, 1mm stretch over a 2m section equates to 5% of breaking strain. There is a note in the selden rjgging guide that says if you're using rods, 5% of breaking strain is 0.7mm stretch in 2m.Is the rigging tension suggested independent of hull and deck design and the differences in stiffness? I would have thought tie rods and stiffening materials would deform or stretch differently from old fashioned plain grp. I do get the need to avoid slackness although this is near impossible to achieve on some older designs due to flexing.
I don't think the failure we've experienced has anything to do with sizing. The Maxi 120 was built for circumnavigation in the 70s. Everything on this boat is massively overengineered, which is why the mast stayed up in a 2m beam-on swell even when all the lowers came down! The point where the tangs failed is 4mm thick stainless plate, and the pattern on the break surface shows it was due to fatigue. The tangs are bolted through the mast on piece of steel dowel, the nuts on it are M24, the configuration of it has a second through bolt a few cm above that also goes right through the mast and has M19 nuts on it.
The fact that this was a fatigue failure means it was due to movement when the shrouds were too loose so I am particularly interested in setting the tension correctly. The Selden rigging guide is very thorough and does indeed advocate checking the rigging at sea under specific conditions, but only *after* setting the correct static stretch of 15% of breaking strain.