Talulah
Well-Known Member
The boat is out and I'm in the throes of replacing the cutlass bearing.
The cutlass bearing housing is mounted to the hull hence the bearing is only accessible from one end.
I’ve removed the prop shaft and started to make longitudinal cuts in the bearing so I can collapse it in on itself to get it out. After a couple of hours with a hand padsaw I’ve made very little progress and have retired back home to come back tomorrow with a bigger hammer! The bearing feels well and truly bonded to the housing.
Tomorrow I shall also be armed with the electric jigsaw but the blades will only reach about 110mm into the inside of the bearing. (The bearing is about 145mm long.) Maybe I’ll be able to extend the cuts with the padsaw. (I don’t have an electric reciprocating saw.)
But why do they make these bearings like this? In order to make removal easier why not have longitudinal cuts in the bearing already? If you had four cuts that extended for three quarters the length of the bearing then inserted the bearing with the cut end first removal would be so much easier. You would just have to finish the cuts. Can anyone think why I should not do this to my replacement bearing?
The cutlass bearing housing is mounted to the hull hence the bearing is only accessible from one end.
I’ve removed the prop shaft and started to make longitudinal cuts in the bearing so I can collapse it in on itself to get it out. After a couple of hours with a hand padsaw I’ve made very little progress and have retired back home to come back tomorrow with a bigger hammer! The bearing feels well and truly bonded to the housing.
Tomorrow I shall also be armed with the electric jigsaw but the blades will only reach about 110mm into the inside of the bearing. (The bearing is about 145mm long.) Maybe I’ll be able to extend the cuts with the padsaw. (I don’t have an electric reciprocating saw.)
But why do they make these bearings like this? In order to make removal easier why not have longitudinal cuts in the bearing already? If you had four cuts that extended for three quarters the length of the bearing then inserted the bearing with the cut end first removal would be so much easier. You would just have to finish the cuts. Can anyone think why I should not do this to my replacement bearing?