Billjratt
Well-Known Member
If you can defocus from connectivity for a minute, I think you should definitely look for ease of use -ie how quickly/easily can you change channels ( I HATE up/down keys) and crucially, can you read what's on the screen?
I'd think there is plenty of marine leisure use they could sell too. BUT what does NMEA2k really give the radio / GPS than 0183 doesn't? My understanding is that 2k has two big advantages:Mm. I wonder what their thinking behind this is.
NMEA 2000 is really only used for leisure marine radios. Non-marine radios don't use it, and commercial shipping still uses 0183 because it's approved by the IMO and 2000 apparently isn't. So maybe it's not a big enough part of their business to bother with?
Why? What 2k data are you wanting the VHF to use or vice versa.It's not going to bother me first-hand for a long time yet, as I have a perfectly satisfactory electronics fit using Seatalk 1 and NMEA 0183 that will go on for many years. But when I am one day assembling a new system (presumably in a new boat) and everything else is NMEA2000 or Ethernet, I shall be mildly annoyed if the radios are still 0183.
what does NMEA2k really give the radio / GPS than 0183 doesn't?
If your plotter doesn't have 0183, then NMEA2k gives you the ability to connect to it, which is the whole point of this branch of the thread.
Yes, considered in isolation 0183 is adequate for radios, but the whole point of a communications protocol is that all stations need to have it in common. Plotters and other instruments are moving away from 0183, so it will be inconvenient if radios don't move with them.
I'm sure someone makes boxes that can take a chosen PGN or two and output the corresponding sentences, and vice versa, but that's additional cost and complexity and fiddly wiring versus just plugging in one waterproof plug.
Pete