Cerddinen
Well-Known Member
No, its not the theory.
I will explain the theory in a moment.....
First of all, leave them alone, just don't go near them. You would lose your stake. Simple.
The "theory" is a fanciful spin put upon this topic by economists who are not practical persons but instead muddled theorists who are confused by their own ideas, bless them...
The reality is that investment is medium to long term, and speculation, with the additional excitement of uncertainty and possible danger is short term to very short term.......and in some cases...very short term indeed....
![]()
Perhaps you should explain the theory because I would dearly love to hear your version of it. The fact that you subscribe such a statement to economists is rather revealing in its own right. Such fanciful spin never appeared in any of the texts I have read - what did appear was APT, CAPM, CCAPM, risk-neutral valuation, binomial pricing, Black-Scholes, Arrow-Debreu state pricing, no-arbitrage. Plus a whole host of empirical tests of excess returns, excess volatility, volatility smiles, etc. etc. I guess you might be mistaking easy-reading investments guides for best-practice economics. Or even making the mistake of thinking that the authors of such books are respected economists. Neither is true.