rogerthebodger
Well-Known Member
With respect Roger, that looks like a bus shelter on the back of your boat.
Designed to keep the sun of in the tropics.
Pic taken our winter 2010.
With respect Roger, that looks like a bus shelter on the back of your boat.
Chris, can you just run past me your explanation of how the clutter is less from the lower scanner height!
Looks better from further off - didn't mean to be rude.Designed to keep the sun of in the tropics.
Pic taken our winter 2010.
Hmm - I get the idea, except I still think that the limited range of a lower radar is too big a price to pay. We get some clutter - but only when its really rough and even then its only out to a few hundred metres and who cares about those distances? If something gets in close without being spotted first it still shows up when the clutter is turned down.See PVB response - got there first - good job too as I had no idea for the technical reason!
For my money lowering the radome and putting up with reduced range to 'reduce the clutter' is all wrong.
Hmm - I get the idea, except I still think that the limited range of a lower radar is too big a price to pay. We get some clutter - but only when its really rough and even then its only out to a few hundred metres and who cares about those distances? If something gets in close without being spotted first it still shows up when the clutter is turned down.
For my money lowering the radome and putting up with reduced range to 'reduce the clutter' is all wrong.
Not very keen on backstay mounts. I viewed a boat which had one, and it seemed to be loading the stay quite unfairly.
Don't think I've sailed on a boat with a pole - but I do currently have a mizzen mast which I find very handy to hold onto / lean against / etc and it seems like a pole might provide the same (at least on one tack).
Pete
Yep i had same thoughts, but looking at detail most weight is take by the deck or chain plate.
The one I am looking at is stainless steel tube
http://www.questusmarine.com/welcome-13.html
Don't suspose you have a picture?
Was worried about drilling lots of holes.....any issues?
Yep i had same thoughts, but looking at detail most weight is take by the deck or chain plate.
Yes I do know - except I can see ships out to 15 or 20 miles (not that I am interested in ships 20 miles away and its not that reliable at that range.)Do you realise how little difference it makes? Maybe 10 miles range with a pole mount, versus maybe 12 miles with a mast mount.
As I have a 23 foot boat, I didn't want any extra weight up the mast, so I went for a Scanstrut backsaty maount with the self levelling mount. This gives very little sea clutter. Thae weight is mainly taken through the chain plate as photos show.