Princess V52 (pics)

kcrane

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 Jul 2005
Messages
1,933
Location
Cheltenham
Visit site
Here are some pictures of the new V52 from the show at Swanwick.

Think V62 that has been through a hot wash and you have the V52. It's designed largely as a 2 cabin boat. The forecabin has plenty of room, and the scissor action beds work well. The full beam master has full standing headroom (well, for me anyway) and would compare very well with other 50ft'ish full beams. The exterior saloon doors are solid affairs, they don't look too much like patio doors and fold out of the way. Generally the boat has an open spacious feel.

Downsides? A third cabin would be a bit of a squeeze, the other two cabins haven't been compromised (good if you want two cabins) so space for a third is tight. I'm not sure why I'd need three seating areas for 6 people (lower saloon, upper saloon, aft deck). SWMBO thought the finish was average and not up to their regular standard (the V62 and V56 were better), it being hull #1 being the obvious explanation. She also picked up that visibility from the helm was restricted by three support pillars and for anyone less than 6ft, the top of the screen was at eyeline height. It was fitted with Cat engines, the controls were too far back and too low to be 'at hand' when berthing.

Not a Princess-only issue and I know I'm not up-to-date fashion-wise but the square edged light wood lacks two things for me. First it doesn't feel boatie, it feels like a city apartment. It also looks easier to make and so looks cheaper. Our Broadblue cat had nicely finished square edged light oak furniture, and that was a fraction of the price. I wonder if matched grain gloss cherry and curved, fiddled, satin finished mahogany are out of fashion or are they too expensive, so builders install squared-off matt oak instead? Just my opinion, I know at least a couple of people who think the opposite.

It was interesting to find they are still marketing the V53 (now V56 with added platform) and charging more for it than the newer V52. I suspect the D13 engine option is part of the attempt to position the V53 as being a powerful 56ft boat in-between the V52 and V62.

It was great to meet a bunch of forumites, jimmy_the_builder acting as an excellent social secretary!
 
I quite like the bright and airey look, but I know what you mean by looking a bit cheap. Still modern and appealing.
The fwd V berth arrangement is clever, impressive boat.

Princess are certainly the most actively marketed UK brand in this country, and from what you mentioned regarding its power option, will give our Volvo-phobic luxury boaters more options to consider.
 
Last edited:
That is a nice peace of machine. I actually prefare the light oak finishes to the darker cherry wood altough Princesses did look good and classy.
I wonder how it will compare against the new Fline 50 Targa GT.

This new model really is a statement that Princess does not want to know anything about IPS or pods.
 
Downsides? A third cabin would be a bit of a squeeze, the other two cabins haven't been compromised (good if you want two cabins) so space for a third is tight. I'm not sure why I'd need three seating areas for 6 people (lower saloon, upper saloon, aft deck).

I thought it would work well as a 3 cabin boat, for the reason you mention, that you could do without the lower dinette, because you have the bigger and lighter enclosed saloon at deck level. The third cabin is always going to be small on a 52 footer, but two doubles and one bunks isn't bad.

I also wasn't mad keen on the light oak, as the veneered faces looked a bit bleached out, and didn't match with the more yellowy edging strips
 
Last edited:
Very hard to tell from a photo how it looks, but Pics2, first picture looks like the only thing missing is Lenny Henry.
P'haps one has to see it in the flesh, but I think its very hard to get these light woods to look good.
 
Not a Princess-only issue and I know I'm not up-to-date fashion-wise but the square edged light wood lacks two things for me. First it doesn't feel boatie, it feels like a city apartment. It also looks easier to make and so looks cheaper. Our Broadblue cat had nicely finished square edged light oak furniture, and that was a fraction of the price. I wonder if matched grain gloss cherry and curved, fiddled, satin finished mahogany are out of fashion or are they too expensive, so builders install squared-off matt oak instead? Just my opinion, I know at least a couple of people who think the opposite.

On the curves v squares thing I think it's just a question of choice/taste/fashion. I much prefer right angles. If you look at the bulkhead at the headboard end of the master cabin in the Sq78, you'll see it is made in a sweeping curve; I'm having it made to a custom design: straight, with two square "pods" port and starboard for the bathroom entrance and wardrobe, and I'm having the foot of the bed made square not curved! (Though the "square" corners won't be sharp; they'll have a radius)

Oak wood can look beautiful but it needs to be finished right, and I think Princess are making a big mistake here. If you look at the oak on many boats (San Lorenzo, Pershing, Fairline, Ferretti come to mind as example of oak boats I've seen recently) it is varnished in a rich colour with a pale gold hue, that looks just right. Princess make it look bleached, more of a beech colour than oak imho, with a hint of pink in the colour, and it just doesn't look good. They really need to fix this and copy the wood finish used by other builders, and get the rich gold hue into the colour mix, and get rid of the pale pink hue. Imho.

Finally, there are too many economies in that joinery. All the wooden box work under the beds has the corners finished in stick-on "L" section wood. It looks awful. There should be a machined section of oak in the corners, with rebates for the plywood sheet parts, a radius, and no edges sticking up proud. Princess are falling behind S/seeker and Fairline in the joinery department
 
Last edited:
Top