JackFrobisher
Well-Known Member
I have a pile mooring in the river Hamble at Swanwick, which is managed by Premier Marinas (used to be Moody’s) and I’ve just received (out of the blue) a supplementary demand for £500 for parking my tender. Has anyone else had one?
I’m prepared to accept that £500 might be a reasonable charge for mooring a dinghy on the Hamble but for 10 years it has been included and now suddenly it’s not.
We had the same thing with electricity during the winter lay-up. In all previous years it was included and then half way through the winter, new pug boxes with meters were installed and now we pay for usage at 10p per unit. As with dinghy parking, the rate on its own might be reasonable but it was included before.
I won't mention anything about half of the yard being redeveloped as housing and a "Pavilion" (whatever that is).
There are perhaps those who might think that Premier Marinas is just another amoral asset stripper but I wouldn't want for a moment to suggest that I am one and I at once distance myself from any such proposal. I couldn't possibly comment one way or the other but I am concerned that I am in danger of being a little cynical because I have a vested interest. What does the panel think?
I’m prepared to accept that £500 might be a reasonable charge for mooring a dinghy on the Hamble but for 10 years it has been included and now suddenly it’s not.
We had the same thing with electricity during the winter lay-up. In all previous years it was included and then half way through the winter, new pug boxes with meters were installed and now we pay for usage at 10p per unit. As with dinghy parking, the rate on its own might be reasonable but it was included before.
I won't mention anything about half of the yard being redeveloped as housing and a "Pavilion" (whatever that is).
There are perhaps those who might think that Premier Marinas is just another amoral asset stripper but I wouldn't want for a moment to suggest that I am one and I at once distance myself from any such proposal. I couldn't possibly comment one way or the other but I am concerned that I am in danger of being a little cynical because I have a vested interest. What does the panel think?