D
Deleted User YDKXO
Guest
I have just finished reading the latest MBM test of the Prestige 550 which is fitted with 2 x Cummins 600hp engines and Zeus drives. This boat is similar in size to my Ferretti 53 although, apparently, it weighs about 6t less. My boat is fitted with 2 x Cat 660hp engines and standard shaftdrives.
According to the MBM test the P550 consumes fuel at around 0.63nmpg at between 20 and 25kts and maxes out at 30kts. On the other hand, my boat consumes fuel at about 0.67nmpg in the same speed range and maxes out at 31kts and that is with all our cruising stuff on board. So despite being 6t heavier and having shaftdrive, my boat consumes less fuel at typical cruising speeds. I have noticed in other tests of flybridge boats with pod drives that fuel efficiency gains seem to be minimal if any at all over shaftdrive boats. It seems to me that pod drives work better with lighter weight sports cruisers than they do with heavier flybridge boats. It is interesting to note that very few mainstream European builders have yet adopted pod drives for their flybridge boats. Maybe they know something we don't?
I accept that pod drives can give other benefits in terms of releasing more space for accommodation and manouvering capability but their primary benefit was always supposed to be fuel efficiency and in many boats, that just doesn't seem to happen. What does the panel think about this?
According to the MBM test the P550 consumes fuel at around 0.63nmpg at between 20 and 25kts and maxes out at 30kts. On the other hand, my boat consumes fuel at about 0.67nmpg in the same speed range and maxes out at 31kts and that is with all our cruising stuff on board. So despite being 6t heavier and having shaftdrive, my boat consumes less fuel at typical cruising speeds. I have noticed in other tests of flybridge boats with pod drives that fuel efficiency gains seem to be minimal if any at all over shaftdrive boats. It seems to me that pod drives work better with lighter weight sports cruisers than they do with heavier flybridge boats. It is interesting to note that very few mainstream European builders have yet adopted pod drives for their flybridge boats. Maybe they know something we don't?
I accept that pod drives can give other benefits in terms of releasing more space for accommodation and manouvering capability but their primary benefit was always supposed to be fuel efficiency and in many boats, that just doesn't seem to happen. What does the panel think about this?