Little Five
Active member
Stunning photos which make me want to go there. Thanks
My thoughts are with all in Christchurch
My thoughts are with all in Christchurch
The first is a 15 second exposure. I had a 30 second exposure too, there was a shoreside beacon with a 6 or 8 second cycle, or something like that - you could see all three flashes in the photo, each moved on a little from the former. The land is blurred a bit, you just can't really see it at the reduced image size. The water was completely calm and the boat tracking dead straight on autopilot. We went into the destination at Pia, an anchor-and-shore-lines mooring in a rocky bay through a narrow rocky pass near the head of the glacier, at about 2 am in pitch black that night - not something to be done in any other sort of weather and without radar... great fun.there were 2 pics that puzzled me (not hard!)
a few second exposure as you were in ?beagle channel, looking over bow. you can see the glow from the nav lights, but the land is not blurry, how did you manage that?
similarly a 0.3 sec exposure of the antartic peninsula, again, how did you keep the boat still enough?
Quite right and my mistake, fixed now.One minor issue on the commentary, which suggests that the 1982 Argentinian invasion and occupation was established 'without resistance'. In actual fact the small detachment of some 85 Royal Marines based on the island put up a spirited defence before taking the only viable option of surrendering.
Uh did you miss the pics from Stanley?Edit: Fantastic weather too. Some people get all the luck.
I didn't. But excessive wind and rain is not unusual in that part of the world. Clear skies and sunshine is rather and in Patagonia the scenery when the suns out is incredible, compared to looking fairly bleak when the weather is miserable.Uh did you miss the pics from Stanley?
And this is biased by the fact that the photographer tends to get a bit precious about his camera when there's salt water being blown around... maybe understandably!
When Kiwi Roa was there you could get permission more easily.I'm surprised that there's only one safe harbour there; there are so many inlets around (Puerto Cook, for example). Presumably you gave your destination as something other than the Falklands...
All on an entry level Nikon D40 with whatever the standard Nikon 18-55 + zoom lens kit package was, with the exception of a few taken on a cheap Olympus waterproof point-and-shoot.These pictures are exceptional, especially to someone who has an ambition to get to that part of the world.
I know it's not a photographic forum, but anyone know what kit was used to take these pictures?
And this is biased by the fact that the photographer tends to get a bit precious about his camera when there's salt water being blown around... maybe understandably! Either that or he's busy worrying about other things..
Can we know if the Rocna anchors pictured in the differents bow rollers are made in bisalloy in NZ and specially tuned or are made in 420 in China
Gee thanks. Kiwi Roa's still there you know . Don't rub it in or I'll tell you about the summer sunshine outside here in Auckland...Got to say I much prefer to view the Falklands using your photos and at home, in the warm and dry and with a handy nearby pub / restaurant, so thanks for taking them and posting them on line.