prv
Well-Known Member
I had heard stories of prats on the Solent who continue to believe that steam gives way to sail
?
(Obviously Rule 9 does "otherwise require" in this case)
Pete
I had heard stories of prats on the Solent who continue to believe that steam gives way to sail
...I had heard stories of prats on the Solent who continue to believe that steam gives way to sail, but until now, I simply didn't believe there could be such stupidity within the leisure pastime I share with you all...
![]()
?
(Obviously Rule 9 does "otherwise require" in this case)
Pete
Time to trump you with an American - Captain Edward Howe Watson.Pah! I see your Admiral Tryon and raise you a Cloudesley Shovell.
For the definition of a 'vessel restricted in her ability to manoeuvre', refer to Reg. 3 in which you will find that any merchant vessel navigating the Solent will be included along with the tanker in this example.
Rule 9 also makes it as clear as the nose on your face that plastic and wood give way to steel.
'Rowlocks' to that... much simpler rules are required.
In another thread someone suggested that the Solent was an amazing exception to global rules on the avoidance of collisions, in that more complex rules are required. I say, 'Rowlocks' to that... much simpler rules are required. Keep out of the way of merchant shipping and don't be so stupid as to have a huge yacht race passing across a narrow and busy shipping lane.
In another thread someone suggested that the Solent was an amazing exception to global rules on the avoidance of collisions, in that more complex rules are required. I say, 'Rowlocks' to that... much simpler rules are required. Keep out of the way of merchant shipping and don't be so stupid as to have a huge yacht race passing across a narrow and busy shipping lane.
Actually it was in this thread, post number 96 if I recall, that I said more complex rules were required in the Solent. The authorities obviously think so, or why else did they come up with the MPZ (in addition to the regular colregs).
Your last suggestion is best filed in a very dark place.
I really don't think more complex rules would work
Rubbish. There are numerous merchant vessels every day navigating the Solent that don't qualify as a 'vessel restricted in her ability to manoeuvre'....For the definition of a 'vessel restricted in her ability to manoeuvre', refer to Reg. 3 in which you will find that any merchant vessel navigating the Solent will be included along with the tanker in this example...
Rubbish. There are numerous merchant vessels every day navigating the Solent that don't qualify as a 'vessel restricted in her ability to manoeuvre'.
Time to trump you with an American - Captain Edward Howe Watson.
I now fully understand the mindset of the Solent sailor.
I still can't understand why the yacht couldn't gybe though.
...... this is the only collision in living memory...
My guess - and I stress this is only a guess - is that he had got into the awkward zone where he was expecting the tanker to start his sharp turn to starboard and a gybe would have put him bang on the anticipated new course. As the tanker carried on towards Gurnard (cf flood tide ) he was forced to point higher and higher until his spinnaker collapsed, his speed dropped and left him as we have seen, stuffed.
I do wonder a) what sound signals if any the tanker made before the 5 hoots as it hit; and b) whether the HM patrol launch said anything to the yacht in the seconds before impact - it certainly shot close past.
None of the above of course excuses him from getting into the awkward zone - but maybe there were other factors of which we do not know.
I am sure and have been boating on the Solent for upwards of 40 years. I negotiate the Medina several times a week and the Lymington river and Portsmouth Harbour several times a month. I have never been involved in or witnessed a collision other than the one being discussed. Nowhere in your quote is there a mention of any other collision.are you sure? You are either very young or have a short memory.
a quote from the solent forum strategic guidance document....
ii. Conflict between recreational activity and other users / uses of the sea
With the wide range of other activities taking place on the Solent it is unsurprising that there is at least some element of conflict or competition between the various forms of activity taking place simultaneously on, in and under the water. Perhaps the most obvious and frequent conflict is between larger, commercial craft and smaller recreational craft. The many ferries and ships which use the Solent have navigational (and commercial) restrictions which mean they are far less manoeuvrable than smaller recreational craft. Anyone attempting to enter or leave Lymington River, Portsmouth Harbour, Southampton Water or the Medina River on a busy summer’s weekend will almost certainly find themselves, at some point, in the path of a ferry, hovercraft, RedJet or large ship. Restricted by their draft, and their sheer size, these craft cannot easily take avoiding action should recreational craft get in their way.
See http://www.solentforum.org/publications/strategic_guidance/SG rectour final.pdf
I do sympathise with your plight in the Solent, it cannot be enjoyable and relaxing, which I thought was the point of sailing?