Akestor
Active member
Hi!
For educational purposes, I created a passage plan for the leg. After calculating the tidal streams for each tidal hour at the hypothetical position of the boat at that time of the trip, I came up with a single vector of all streams and got a 2.6kn stream towards 285 degrees.
The ground track is 151 true, and calculating the CTS with 5.5 kn speed got 130 degrees.
The problem is that with the stream, the average SOG decreases to 3.2kn, which kills the whole plan since the boat will not be at the hourly positions assumed with the 5.5kn speed.
Extending the Ground track to 5.5 miles ( to the point the boat is expected to be in 1 hour) and connecting the edge of the tidal vector with the new end at 5.5 miles, found that the average speed through the water should be 7.6 kn to be at the area of expected streams, and the new CTS around 135'
Is this process acceptable? assuming no use of GPS.
For educational purposes, I created a passage plan for the leg. After calculating the tidal streams for each tidal hour at the hypothetical position of the boat at that time of the trip, I came up with a single vector of all streams and got a 2.6kn stream towards 285 degrees.
The ground track is 151 true, and calculating the CTS with 5.5 kn speed got 130 degrees.
The problem is that with the stream, the average SOG decreases to 3.2kn, which kills the whole plan since the boat will not be at the hourly positions assumed with the 5.5kn speed.
Extending the Ground track to 5.5 miles ( to the point the boat is expected to be in 1 hour) and connecting the edge of the tidal vector with the new end at 5.5 miles, found that the average speed through the water should be 7.6 kn to be at the area of expected streams, and the new CTS around 135'
Is this process acceptable? assuming no use of GPS.