Daydream believer
Well-Known Member
Exactly. That is where they started /QUOTE]
Oyster 26 ?
Lovely little boat
Exactly. That is where they started /QUOTE]
Oyster 26 ?
Lovely little boat
It was GT Yachts, who built the GT35 in 2014. They only built one, and I think it may be inaccurate to say that they sold it. As I recall, the ownership was transferred to the boatbuilder and the boat is still for sale, 4 years later, at a fraction of the original asking price (£140K vs £320K).
They claimed that a client had been so impressed with the design that he bought one off-plan, but it turned out that the "client" was the (now late) owner of the company who built them under contract, that it had been "ordered" in an attempt to get sales momentum going and that it was almost immediately on the market. It'll be a good buy for someone, eventually.
Forumites do love keeping on about this particular aberration.
I think we should have GT35 law instead of Godwin's for this particular forum
I think they (Windboats) were looking for something to fill the hole in their Production Capacity left by (ironically enough) the departure of Oyster as their principal client, after Oyster were bought by HTP. The GT didn't fit the bill as it goes, but they ended up building Gunfleets instead.
Sounds likely. Were the blokes in a shed who made Polina Star II originally Windboats subcontractors?
Err, no. Bridgland were an Oyster subby, not a Windboats one.
Whilst technically correct that Bridgland Moulders worked for Oyster, they did supply the Oyster mouldings to Windboats to be fitted out. I don't think Windboats have any moulding capability.
Is betting allowed on the forum??
1 year
2 years
3 years
Success ??
One hopes that it is the latter but when one reads "a heart thing," one does tend to worry. These things need to be "Financial" to succeed ,because profit over the long term is what makes a company survive.
Given that the new owner of Oyster made his fortune with only line gambling, this is an ironic post!
I think the challenge for the new owner will be to reduce the costs and overheads (already hinted). When he mentions smaller yachts I suspect he means those that can be built in Wrexham. I.e. 45- 65ft. or so. Labour costs are lower; its a modern facility.
Wroxham maybe?Wrexham?? ....
An awful lot of great yachts have been built by people you disparage as 'little men with buckets of resin', and not just by Oyster.
A lot of problems occur when people try to move away from that sort of thing and cock it up.
Given that the new owner of Oyster made his fortune with on-line gambling, this is an ironic post!
TS
You seem to be conflating Bridglands with the Oyster facility, previously Landamores. - This was a new-ish facility the yard moved into in the last 10 years (can’t remember exactly when).Wrexham?? Do you mean Norfolk? Labour costs may be lower, but it's surely not a modern facility, it's a shed in the middle of nowhere with little men wielding buckets of resin (sometimes not too successfully, it seems).
You seem to be conflating Bridglands with the Oyster facility, previously Landamores. - This was a new-ish facility the yard moved into in the last 10 years (can’t remember exactly when).
An awful lot of great yachts have been built by people you disparage as 'little men with buckets of resin', and not just by Oyster.
A lot of problems occur when people try to move away from that sort of thing and cock it up.