Outdrives = absurd.

burgundyben

Well-known member
Joined
28 Nov 2002
Messages
7,485
Location
Niton Radio
Visit site
Just read NoIllusions post about hydraulic rams and in particular Solitaires post about spending 3 grand on some peripheral bits and bobs.

Its madness, for 3 grand I could replace both gearboxes, both shafts, both seal housings, both couplings and both props.

Why would anyone want an outdrive?



<hr width=100% size=1>Sod the Healey - I think I'll buy an E-Type.
 

milltech

Active member
Joined
31 May 2001
Messages
2,518
Location
Worcester
www.iTalkFM.com
If I can think far enough back, the only known benefit I can recall was seeing the outdrive boats getting in closer to the beach at Studland for a perve.

<hr width=100% size=1>John
<A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.allgadgets.co.uk>http://www.allgadgets.co.uk</A>
 

Baltimore_Bill

New member
Joined
30 Apr 2002
Messages
57
Location
Country: UK County: Hampshire State: Drunk most of
Visit site
I saves on diving costs.

When you get rope round the props, you just lift the legs up under drybollic power and hang over the back to untwiddle the string. You only get wet if some inconsiderate berk drives past too fast - (see appropriate thread.)

I always wondered why Lewmar don't just put a three blade propellor on top of their winches. Much more effective at catching ropes than those stupid self-tailing things they use at the moment.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

DavidJ

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2001
Messages
5,925
Location
home in Brum. S37 sold, was in Med Spain.
Visit site
All my boats have been stern drives and I often ask the same question. We all have depth gauges do we really want to travel in really shallow water. In a dozen years of boating I've never had a prop foul up so although a nuisance the occurence must be quite rare. Manoverability is a lot worse with stean drives, especially in reverse. taking them off for bellows changing every 2 years is a DIY nightmare.
On the positive. I think maybe 1 or 2 knots faster, less space taken up and quieter due to the exhaust thru the prop, easier for the boat manufacturers to fit.


<hr width=100% size=1>
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
28,265
Location
Medway
Visit site
Re: Assembled off site

Engine/outdrives cheaper to fit no skilled labour and just bolt to big jig drilled hole in back bit.
Shaft/gearbox stuff bit more difficult ie takes longer to align and you need to pay experienced fitter person more dosh,I would guess.
Reckon i could bolt a couple o legs on mesself,but bore a hole for a shaft and then make the thing line up with the gearbox??.

<hr width=100% size=1>If it aint broke fix it till it is.
 

PhilF

New member
Joined
18 Jun 2001
Messages
2,564
Location
In a state
Visit site
First time at Chiswick Pier.
Idiot on shore, emergency untie, rope round props.
Thank gawd for outdrives otherwise I would have been washed out to sea.
Ask MarcC

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

tico

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
3,199
Location
Worcestershire/Pembrokeshire
Visit site
Seems I remember someone who backed over his mooring line earlier this season??????

Would have been easier to untangle with outdrives methinks???

<hr width=100% size=1>Been there, done that, got the oily T shirt
 

hlb

RIP
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
26,774
Location
Any Pub Lancashire or Wales
Visit site
Rope cutters soon deal with the tangles. I've had outdrives, would never go back to those Kenwood chef unstearable abortions. Mucky farter does exactly what it says on the tin and slots in any where, glad I ait got the food mixers on the back.../forums/images/icons/laugh.gif

<hr width=100% size=1> <font color=blue>No one can force me to come here.<font color=red> I'm a volunteer!!.<font color=blue>

Haydn
 

JohnRob

New member
Joined
12 Aug 2003
Messages
220
Visit site
I wouldn't go back. simply for ease of handling etc - Given the annual service ££££s, outdrives didn't seem to be that much more.

Interesting comparison re efficiency - theres a few boats out now that give you option of shaft or o/drive. KAD 300 + o/d c. 1.8mpg KAMD + shafts 1.1mpg.

If a car gave one nearly another 2/3rds range and get there quite a bit quicker, might one be tempted?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

JohnRob

New member
Joined
12 Aug 2003
Messages
220
Visit site
I wouldn't go back. simply for ease of handling etc - Given the annual service ££££s, outdrives didn't seem to be that much more.

Interesting comparison re efficiency - theres a few boats out now that give you option of shaft or o/drive. KAD 300 + o/d c. 1.8mpg KAMD + shafts 1.1mpg.

If a car gave one nearly another 2/3rds range and get there quite a bit quicker, might one be tempted?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Solitaire

Active member
Joined
25 Jun 2001
Messages
6,239
Location
Southampton
Visit site
Oh, the pain!!! PLEASE address your comments to RK Marine! /forums/images/icons/smile.gif Got to other wise just [cry]

<hr width=100% size=1>Boating is <A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.powerboat-training.co.uk>Serious</A> Fun
 
Top