One for you guys with MAN (mechanical governor) engines

The 2848 in 800hp flavour is exactly the DE2848LE403 that I mentioned at the beginning.
Aside from smoking upon cold start, if you have any other remarks/experiences on them, I'm all ears.
I guess that on a Pershing they are bound to be stretched quite often... :cool:

Been off air for a good while, so many comments difficult to know where to start.

#1 Mechanical or electronic, or even EDC smart governor dumb pump, MAN or any other flavor of motor rules are generally the same.

Priority with mechanical and EDC motors is the 1,000 hour injector change out, it is vital as these injectors run real cold and will fail if not changed out. Never really understood it but pal at MAN MEC in the U.S always made a point of using MAN sourced Bosch tips and not Bosch aftermarket tip no clue if this was MAN B.S. or not however spitting a tip in the jug at rated speed is a lousy way of discovering the difference.

High output mechanical engines of any flavour with Bosch inline fuel systems have RQV or in some cases RSV governing which has no impact on cold start smoke. High output engines have retarded timing, low compression, highly efficient charge air cooling and high output piston cooling. Timing is linear on mechanical pumps rack is pulled into overfuel on engine shutdown and in many models of pump held in with a magnetic catch. In normal conditions this is all a recipe for a smoky start at best. However, some owners are manic throttle twiddlers both before and after start up, magnetic catch drops out and engine cranks over filling low compression pots with raw fuel before starting and whammy, smoke out! EDC does have a limited amount of timing advance to mitigate some start up smoke.

Electronically controlled engines have far more start up tricks as they have a 3D not linear timing/fuelling table pretty much eliminating cold start smoke, experience a Cat C12 starting at Artic ambient temperatures can be terrifying, ECM puts in a large slug of timing advance, so large that it sounds like the crankcase is full of little Trolls with hammers trying to escape, but almost no smoke.

As to overloading heavily weeded boats by application of excessive 'tight wire' is a killer. Remember your throttle lever is the same as a car cruise control. You set the rpm AKA road speed in cruise control. Below WOT engine fuel pump governor increases/decreases fuelling to hold set engine speed and with clean bottom has excess power to respond to propeller demand. As soon as vessel becomes heavily weeded propeller demand changes, but one has to remember that failing to reach WOT speed by say just 200 rpm governor is attempting to fuel for higher speed and the overfuel not liner but the propeller exponent. Driving a heavily weeded vessel hard can result in engines being overloaded by over 100%.

Electronically controlled engines have no magic levers to pull preventing overloading, once the data display reaches 100% engine load controls have no way recording anything greater, just remember that an engine at WOT displaying 100% engine load can actually be 150% overloaded. Nice feature of MAN display is EGT. A properly optimised engine correctly loaded will have minimal EGT’s at low D speeds, as the vessel transitions over the ‘hump’ EGT rises then falls slightly, then rising again with increasing rpm, however in an ideal world EGT levels out toward WOT. If you are hammering overloaded vessel ‘showing’ 100% engine load with EGT going into the Stratosphere you KNOW display is telling porkies!

As to MAN servicing costs one has to carefully look at the individual ratings, some call for a competitive 500hr service, however other ratings is 200 hrs, a matter of RTFM before commenting on service costs.
 
Very useful reading as always P, many thanks.
Any engine-related debate is only half interesting without your contribution, and I hope that having been offline for a while wasn't due to health or any other sort of troubles!

I expected electronically controlled engines to have some means of preventing overloading, which is (I would think) even more important that avoiding smoke upon cold start.
But if you say that there's no way to do that, I take your word for it of course.
Just curious, since you mention EGT as a nice features of MAN displays - do you mean that it's missing in the equivalent CAT displays ("MPD" for Marine Power Display, I think they are called)?

And a last but more generic question, if you don't mind.
I'm looking at several boats of early 2000 vintage, 55 feet or so, all powered by one of the following engines:
1) the MAN V8 800hp which is the subject of this thread, or
2) CAT 3196/C12 (660 to 710hp, depending on the years), or
3) CAT 3406/C15 (800hp)
Actually, I also came across some intriguing boats with larger engines, like a Sanlorenzo 62 powered by V12 MAN and a Tecnomarine T62 powered by a V12 MTU, but eventually I came to my senses. Well, almost... :)
Back to the point, which would be your preferred choice between the above three, from a reliability/durability viewpoint?
My understanding is that the 3406 should be the most solid of the lot, and the MAN possibly the less, but I would really appreciate your take on that.
 
I am surprised about this remark, cause I always think Cat prices are much cheaper. New Volvo engine parts though on the other hand are something else even to Man engines.
I am buying all my parts in the UK so there might be differences country to country across Europe depending on the local dealer's pricing structure. Certainly the prices I am paying for MAN spares in the UK (from PME) are cheaper than the prices I was paying for Cat spares (from Finnings)

This is a comparison of parts prices I paid this year for the MAN D2842LE443 engines in my current boat against prices paid in 2010 for the Cat 3196 engines in my previous boat

Oil filter £11.86 (MAN) £25.94 (Cat)
Fuel filter £15.34 (MAN) £19.11 (Cat)
Impellor £202.72 (MAN) £373.16 (Cat)

The only MAN item which costs more is the drive belt at £36.30 compared to the Cat belt at £30.15 but then the MANs are considerably bigger engines
 
Just curious, since you mention EGT as a nice features of MAN displays - do you mean that it's missing in the equivalent CAT displays ("MPD" for Marine Power Display, I think they are called)?
I did not have EGT displayed on the instrumentation of my Cat 3196 engines although the C12 version might have. I had no complaints at all about the 3196s in my Ferretti 53. Never had any issues in 4 years of ownership and they never consumed any oil between services
 
Very useful reading as always P, many thanks.
Any engine-related debate is only half interesting without your contribution, and I hope that having been offline for a while wasn't due to health or any other sort of troubles!

I expected electronically controlled engines to have some means of preventing overloading, which is (I would think) even more important that avoiding smoke upon cold start.
But if you say that there's no way to do that, I take your word for it of course.
Just curious, since you mention EGT as a nice features of MAN displays - do you mean that it's missing in the equivalent CAT displays ("MPD" for Marine Power Display, I think they are called)?

And a last but more generic question, if you don't mind.
I'm looking at several boats of early 2000 vintage, 55 feet or so, all powered by one of the following engines:
1) the MAN V8 800hp which is the subject of this thread, or
2) CAT 3196/C12 (660 to 710hp, depending on the years), or
3) CAT 3406/C15 (800hp)
Actually, I also came across some intriguing boats with larger engines, like a Sanlorenzo 62 powered by V12 MAN and a Tecnomarine T62 powered by a V12 MTU, but eventually I came to my senses. Well, almost... :)
Back to the point, which would be your preferred choice between the above three, from a reliability/durability viewpoint?
My understanding is that the 3406 should be the most solid of the lot, and the MAN possibly the less, but I would really appreciate your take on that.

O gawd de-rating at rated speed to prevent engine overload, don't even go there!

Any attempt to mess with fueling at rated speed of a certified engine is an absolute non starter. Potentially commercial suicide for an engine manufacturer, have CPE (Combustion Performance Emissions) engineers running for their tin hats and have EPA eagles and lawyers salivating at the prospect of a kill. Under current rules this could be viewed as a potential emissions defeat strategy.

Please remember that at Tier 3 emissions vessel MUST be propped in accordance with manufacturers guidelines as overloaded engine is non compliant. Only U.S. at the moment but RCD II is a straight lift of EPA Tier 3.

Many thanks inquiring about my health, good news is that I was holidaying in France in rude health with sick phone, however any discussion regarding practical impact of Tier 3 may cause serious mental decline.

As to engine choice in quoted power node...

#1 3406
#2 3406
#3 3406
 
Many thanks inquiring about my health, good news is that I was holidaying in France in rude health with sick phone, however any discussion regarding practical impact of Tier 3 may cause serious mental decline.
In that case Tier 4, particularly Tier 4F, is going to give you a nervous breakdown. In fact I might have one first;)
 
As to engine choice in quoted power node...

#1 3406
#2 3406
#3 3406
Well, if that isn't a straightforward view, I don't know what else can be...! :encouragement:
Not that I'm surprised though, because I've yet to meet anyone with first hand knowledge/experience that doesn't rank the 3400 series among the very best marine diesel engines.

Just to double check, would you rate as equally good also the latest 3406 version, i.e. the C15 DITA (2007 or 2008 vintage - I'm not 100% sure, as well as I'm not sure if they are labelled as "Acert" or not)?
I'm asking because one of the boats I'm considering is powered by them, and they told me that one was rebuilt under warranty by Cat due to some sort of catastrophic valves failure.
Something you wouldn't expect from an engine with such a good reputation...
...Hence my doubt about whether there was something wrong with these latest versions (maybe due to some emissions modifications?), or if it's just a matter of sh!t happening?

Thanks in advance!
 
Top