Navagation

charlieharper

New Member
Joined
13 Aug 2012
Messages
12
Visit site
Hi all, just a quick question. Whilst in the Armed Forces I was taught to navigate by using the "Mag to grid get rid/ Grid to mag add" is this the same as this eastings and westings thing I keep reading about?

Thanks Charlie
 
Swapping between mag, true and compass bearings needs to adjusted for declination and deviation. So to answer your question, the difference between each reading could be either east or west. Then the rhyme “error west compass best (meaning biggest value)” and “error east compass least” works.

"Mag to grid get rid/ Grid to mag add" will only apply when magnetic north is west of true/grid north.
 
That mnemonic might be referring to the OS grid.

Anyway, you'll need to do something similar to convert between magnetic and true. The one I use, similar to PuffTheMagicDragon is if the Variation is West, Compass is best (i.e. add the Variation to True to get Magnetic) and if variation is East, Compass is least (i.e. subtract to get Magnetic)
 
"Magnetic is ten more than true, near enough, and who knows or cares what the deviation is?"
I did when I mounted a fire extinguisher bracket next to the compass and got 14 degrees deviation for my sins.

I can't remember mnemonics; I just keep a mental picture of the compass grid in my mind.
 
Hi all, just a quick question. Whilst in the Armed Forces I was taught to navigate by using the "Mag to grid get rid/ Grid to mag add" is this the same as this eastings and westings thing I keep reading about?

Thanks Charlie
When I first learned to navigate a yacht, all my previous navigation experience was as a mountain leader and in mountain rescue, where we commonly used "Add for mag, get rid for grid" to convert between magnetic and true bearings, so that is what I used. It still works, although Baddox is right about W variation.

If the vast majority of your sailing is in local waters, then you should be fine as you are, otherwise swap to the west is best thing...
 
"Magnetic is ten more than true, near enough, and who knows or cares what the deviation is?"

Magnetic variation for Scotland ( discounting any exceptional local variation) varies between 2. ( around Peterhead)& 5 degrees( far west isles) to the nearest degree
So your 10 ( assuming you mean degrees) is somewhat out.
Unless you are referring to the swing to the Scottish communist party - Sorry I meant SNP
 
Magnetic variation for Scotland ( discounting any exceptional local variation) varies between 2. ( around Peterhead)& 5 degrees( far west isles) to the nearest degree
So your 10 ( assuming you mean degrees) is somewhat out.
Unless you are referring to the swing to the Scottish communist party - Sorry I meant SNP

At 11'E per year that makes your charts about 27 years old. Maybe not too old in paleogeological terms but they've invented cardinal marks since then and all the black starboard hand buoys have gone.

They are indeed 27 years old. "Between five and two" is close enough to "zero" for me ... my life just got (even) easier!
 
Top