ProDave
Well-Known Member
James Griffin, skipper and MD of Wyvern Shipping, gave his slide show at my local club; we staggered out exclaming "What a bloody fool!"
Ocean Princess was NOT designed and built for seagoing voyages at all. Stormbound in Dover the authorities impounded the vessel until improvements were made - new foredeck, sealed doors, window covers etcet - and a whole stack of safety equipment, added. Even then his 'adventures' showed that he was no mariner, making Tim Spall look like a Yachtmaster.
But if you want a good larf, book him now!
They certainly intended to make it a sea going vessel, but didn't read the rule book very closely first.
It was only impounded, because it was over 70 feet long, so fell into a category that had to meet certain requirements for sea. Some of the items it fell short of were the number and type of flares, and the number of fire extinguishers.
I am guessing they designed the boat at 72 feet long, the maximum for the canals. Had they chosen 69 feet, they would not have been impounded and would not have been forced to make the changes, thought no doubt they would have been advised to. If I were designing a narroboat, I would make it no longer than 55 feet, then it would be able to navigate all of the canals. At 72 feet, it has some limitations on the inland waterways.
It may not be sea worthy by the definition most on this forum use, but it has made some long passages and it didn't sink, so I think it met it's design criteria.