Cardo
Well-Known Member
Hey, you should know we never had time to sleep...(spoke to the Adams family yesterday by the way.. even answered his phone)
Oooh, how is the retired Mr Adams?
Hey, you should know we never had time to sleep...(spoke to the Adams family yesterday by the way.. even answered his phone)
In most cases I would agree and say that anchoring is better as you know your own tackle.
I have the problem in that when I sleep I really sleep and would probably only wake up if water was lapping around me in bed (even then I may struggle)
Anchoring knowing that with the wind blowing you off the shore is fine as if you do drag you just wake up with more of a sea view.
What about when you are so knackered you need to rest but it is a lee shore. You have the option of a buoy of unknown origin, anchoring and hope you don't drag or going out to sea and heaving too.
So given the choice would you anchor or go for the big orange buoy?
If it (the mooring) failed I could lose my boat, give myself a lot of hassle, and end up having to compensate the owner of the mooring.
Not under UK law you wouldn't.
In the UK we often just picked up buoys, depending on its condition & weather. Only once can I recall being advised to
move as some snotty jock fisherman owned the mooring.
I recall that the buoy Nostro refers to is there for a purpose (not a visitor mooring!) but I can't remember what. Perhaps it marks a rare jellyfish copulating area.
IME buoys in the Med are not as prolific as as UK; they are income generating.
Every time I picked one up I was visited by a speeding RiB complete with Spaniard and outstretched hand.
"Weekly"?? I'd have thought it would be difficult to repeat?
If you read the right thread it's explained: there's a stitch-back clause...
Mike.
Back in 2002 a German Jeanneau Sun Legende went through the canal at night. He did not see the bridge and did not stop. You can guess the rest.
Not under UK law you wouldn't.
That's a very definite statement. Maybe you are a lawyer and know about these things but I'd be interested to know what authority you have for saying that.
My (admittedly ancient) edition of volume 4 of Marsden - British Shipping Law begins:
"Damage caused by negligence
Where damage is done to persons or to property of any kind on land or on water, owing to the negligent navigation or management of a vessel, a cause of action arises against those who, by their own negligence or by the negligence of their servants or agents, caused such damage."
If you negligently damage someone's property, he can sue you for damages. Why is the situation different when the property is someone's mooring tackle? If you break his mooring, or move it out of position, he may have to pay a mooring contractor a lot of money to put it right.
Just to be clear, I'm not talking about a hired mooring and I don't think the OP is either.
Parsfal, No one seems to know who this buoy belongs to.
He's not talking about your big orange buoy, he's just responding to Sandyman's frankly bizarre assertion that a mariner would not be liable if he picked up a private mooring, uninvited, and broke it.
Pete
No contest.
I know my ground tackle is more than adequately sized for my boat and I know it's in good condition. Why would I risk using a mooring I know nothing about?
If it (the mooring) failed I could lose my boat, give myself a lot of hassle, and end up having to compensate the owner of the mooring.