mooring block?

CorrodedShackle1.jpg


:eek:

IMG_2152.jpg


:eek:


Any more...?

I noticed that the eye of the shackle is eroded as well, might be an electrolytic action here. Might be the mousing wire eating away the steel of the shackle. One NO NO is to use copper wire to secure the shackle.
 
I noticed that the eye of the shackle is eroded as well, might be an electrolytic action here. Might be the mousing wire eating away the steel of the shackle. One NO NO is to use copper wire to secure the shackle.

I have no idea what was fitted when the above was new. The reality is that no - repeat NO - mooring assemblies remain new for more than a few hours. As no-one has produced any means whatever of predicting wear/corrosion rates, the only reliable technique is to fit really good kit, inspect it frequently, replace at the first signs of trouble - and record what you measure so you can show your insurers....

Do remember that, if your boat goes walkabout and smashes into others - or splits its diesel tanks pounding against the harbour wall - there may be a far larger bill to meet than just the cost of hauling your wreck out of the water.

And, if you neglect to have evidence of maintenance to put in front of your insurers when they ask, you may well have to meet those bills on your own...

:eek:
 
Box is 4 foot lg
what size yacht..25 to 30 foot

One NO NO is to use copper wire to secure the shackle.

plastic cable ties seem to be the best for this!

Not sure how long the riser chain needs to be?
also size of chain?
 
I have no idea what was fitted when the above was new. The reality is that no - repeat NO - mooring assemblies remain new for more than a few hours. As no-one has produced any means whatever of predicting wear/corrosion rates, the only reliable technique is to fit really good kit, inspect it frequently, replace at the first signs of trouble - and record what you measure so you can show your insurers....

Do remember that, if your boat goes walkabout and smashes into others - or splits its diesel tanks pounding against the harbour wall - there may be a far larger bill to meet than just the cost of hauling your wreck out of the water.

And, if you neglect to have evidence of maintenance to put in front of your insurers when they ask, you may well have to meet those bills on your own...

:eek:
Given that we can now buy Dyneema "shackles" why cant we use this material instead of steel?
Stu
 
Blimey, that's a sweeping statement.

Thinking of all the civil engineering constructed using concrete, what sort of time scale are you looking at?

We do like 'un to last a long time down 'ere ! Also we've got plenty of granite. Concrete, especially with lumps of steel in, can break up. 'Concrete cancer' occurs in air, must also be a risk under water.

Another point - never use stainless steel swivels or shackles mixed with steel - causes fast corrosion. Have known moorings break because of this.
I use two shackles at each join. Use a smaller one through links so that if this breaks, the larger one is a security. Mouse shackles with a cable tie and seizing wire. Cable ties can degrade in UV light.
 
I think that's a question best put to your insurers. If they indicate their satisfaction in writing, then 'bob's your uncle'....

:D
In the nicest possible way, we dont have to tell or get permission to use steel. So going back to the original question, is there a reason why we cant use Dyneema?
Stu
 
In the nicest possible way, we dont have to tell or get permission to use steel. So going back to the original question, is there a reason why we cant use Dyneema?
Stu

I would be really really really worried about the fibres being chaffed on the seabed with the abrasive action of sand. I don’t trust steel shackles but would not sleep at night with a "bit of string" holding my boat.
 
it seems that Dyneema can be used successfully underwater, with a "deltaflex" cover:-


http://www.pressreleasefinder.com/rss.asp?id=7893


and here's the Deltaflex details:-

http://www.deltaflex.com/

which makes it look like a very tough rubber cover.


Mountaineers use Dyneema a lot, but how it copes with running over rock (jimi ???).


It is also in use for fishing trawls, so there must be some considerable operational advantages to using it instead of steel rope or chain.

http://www.worldfishing.net/news101/van-beelen-continues-success
 
it seems that Dyneema can be used successfully underwater, with a "deltaflex" cover:-


http://www.pressreleasefinder.com/rss.asp?id=7893


and here's the Deltaflex details:-

http://www.deltaflex.com/

which makes it look like a very tough rubber cover.


Mountaineers use Dyneema a lot, but how it copes with running over rock (jimi ???).


It is also in use for fishing trawls, so there must be some considerable operational advantages to using it instead of steel rope or chain.

http://www.worldfishing.net/news101/van-beelen-continues-success
At the back of my mind is something I saw about replacing stainless standing rigging with Dyneema. If it is good enough to do that? Plus all the examples you have found, perhaps peeps should be considering it.
Stu
 
Top