john_morris_uk
Well-Known Member
Someone has suggested that they can set a moisture meter for 'depth'. In otherwords, they are suggested that it will ignore water tanks and bulkheads that traditionally have interfered with accurate moisture measurments.
I am somewhat sceptical and wonder whether anyone has any expert knowledge on the subject. (I have been used to using Tramex' meters but I believe that the one I saw being used was a Sovereign. However I may have remembered the name on the case incorrectly or it might have been an older model as it didn't look like any of the Sovereign meters being advertised currently.)
I am also aware that the whole moisture in a hull thing is fraught with difficulties and contradicting views. In the same way that if you ask five economics advisors what will happen to the economy, you will get six answers, so it seems with surveyors, moisture in hull readings and their prognosis.
Treatements are expensive, but we want to apply Coppercoat and I certainly don't want to apply epoxy over grp that contains moisture. That would be the road to even more expense and problems and a waste of Coppercoat!
I am somewhat sceptical and wonder whether anyone has any expert knowledge on the subject. (I have been used to using Tramex' meters but I believe that the one I saw being used was a Sovereign. However I may have remembered the name on the case incorrectly or it might have been an older model as it didn't look like any of the Sovereign meters being advertised currently.)
I am also aware that the whole moisture in a hull thing is fraught with difficulties and contradicting views. In the same way that if you ask five economics advisors what will happen to the economy, you will get six answers, so it seems with surveyors, moisture in hull readings and their prognosis.
Treatements are expensive, but we want to apply Coppercoat and I certainly don't want to apply epoxy over grp that contains moisture. That would be the road to even more expense and problems and a waste of Coppercoat!