franksingleton
Well-Known Member
I do not sail in the area so cannot comment on the original post. I would like to comment on some general matters.
• It is a long time since I last used 2G. My recollection from our Mediterranean days in the early 2000s, was that it allowed us to use email with Saildocs to get text forecasts and GRIBs
• We have used and still use GPRS if 3G is not available. Again with email you can send/ receive emails so can get texts of forecasts and GRIBs using Saildocs.
• However, with GPRS you can download GRIB directly from zuGrib or Ugrib as these use FTP. Keep costs down by selecting area, grid spacing etc.
• XCWeather, Magic Seaweed, WindGuru, Windfinder etc all are GFS. But to use these requires a browser with the attendant overheads of adverts and html coding. It should be more cost effective to use zyGrib or UGtib with far more information available with more flexibility.
• Any area forecast in an area of complex topography will be hit and miss. I always use CG/CROSS etc plus GRIBs plus commonsense.
• If you want some detail you might like to try http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/wrfnmm.php?ech=3&mode=3&map=330 with a (claimed) 2 km resolution or http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/hirlam.php?ech=3&mode=3&map=430 with a 10 km resolution.
However, even the WRF, despite its 2 km resolution, will probably not meet JumbleDuck’s requirements in the Firth Of Clyde. One reason is that its initial analysis is probably no better than the GFS T=0 at 25 km. Just possibly it could be using the ECMWF at analysis, about 15 km. The HIRLAM forecast although using a 10 km grid might be better since it uses an analysis with a 10 km grid.
I may have muddied the waters but hope this might help.
• It is a long time since I last used 2G. My recollection from our Mediterranean days in the early 2000s, was that it allowed us to use email with Saildocs to get text forecasts and GRIBs
• We have used and still use GPRS if 3G is not available. Again with email you can send/ receive emails so can get texts of forecasts and GRIBs using Saildocs.
• However, with GPRS you can download GRIB directly from zuGrib or Ugrib as these use FTP. Keep costs down by selecting area, grid spacing etc.
• XCWeather, Magic Seaweed, WindGuru, Windfinder etc all are GFS. But to use these requires a browser with the attendant overheads of adverts and html coding. It should be more cost effective to use zyGrib or UGtib with far more information available with more flexibility.
• Any area forecast in an area of complex topography will be hit and miss. I always use CG/CROSS etc plus GRIBs plus commonsense.
• If you want some detail you might like to try http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/wrfnmm.php?ech=3&mode=3&map=330 with a (claimed) 2 km resolution or http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/hirlam.php?ech=3&mode=3&map=430 with a 10 km resolution.
However, even the WRF, despite its 2 km resolution, will probably not meet JumbleDuck’s requirements in the Firth Of Clyde. One reason is that its initial analysis is probably no better than the GFS T=0 at 25 km. Just possibly it could be using the ECMWF at analysis, about 15 km. The HIRLAM forecast although using a 10 km grid might be better since it uses an analysis with a 10 km grid.
I may have muddied the waters but hope this might help.