Mistake when installing thruhulls (Trudesign)

LittleSister

Well-known member
Joined
12 Nov 2007
Messages
18,650
Location
Me Norfolk/Suffolk border - Boat Deben & Southwold
Visit site
As Fr J Hackett says you only need sealant between the fitting and the hull. You do not need sealant between the skin fitting's threads inside the hull and the securing nut.

Personally, I see no advantage, and only disadvantage, in using a high adhesive sealant in this application. A low adhesive sealant is preferable in this (and almost all boat related sealing situations) in my view. The fitting's flange and internal nut are plenty strong enough to hold the fitting to the hull. Why on earth would you need strong adhesive here? Why the manufacturers recommend a high adhesive sealant is beyond me. It just needs to be slightly adhesive (just sticky) to ensure it makes a close bond with the fitting and hull.

The sealant is only there to fill - 'seal' (the clue's in the name) - the tiny gaps between the skin fitting flange and the hull to prevent water ingress. This does not take a lot of sealant. If your hull surface and skin fitting flange were perfectly smooth and flat (they're not) you would not need any sealant. It's just there to fill the surface imperfections and slight differences in shape (e.g. flat flange vs. slightly curved hull) Any significant thickness of sealant beyond this remaining after fitting is undesirable as it weakens the rigidity of the fitting in the hull.

You do need to apply enough sealant so that you have a slight surplus - put on, say, equivalent to an eighth of an inch or 3mm across the whole surface of the flange. The surplus is 'only' needed so you can see that there is sealant coverage around the entire circumference of the flange when you tighten it down. Tighten the nut progressively as much as you can and do so BEFORE THE SEALANT SETS! (Assuming its a setting sealant.) Note that because of the high viscosity of the sealant it will take a little time for all surplus to be squeezed out. So progressively tighten the nut, first by hand then by spanner, leave a few minutes and tighten again, as hard as you can without damaging the fitting or hull material.
Ignore those who say leave it slack and tighten later 'so you don't squeeze all the sealant out' - you won't. You want the sealant squeezed into the all voids and imperfections resulting from machining and slight differences in shape, and you don't need sealant (but anyway won't be able to avoid having some) where there is a perfect mating between the two faces. Any that can be squeezed out should be - it is not helping but only hindering. (Note that in other applications different technique is required - e.g. when using non-setting sealant (such as butyl) to seal windows in a coachroof, where you do need to leave a significant continuous layer of sealant to take up movement and flexing, but in those situations you never fully tighten the clamping screws.) Wipe away the sealant that has squeezed out from under the fitting - it's now doing nothing but looking bad.

As for the thread between the skin fitting and a seacock, hose tail or whatever, these are normally sealed by the thread itself and/or the tapered faces at the ends of the thread. Like Fr J Hackett I've only ever used PTFE tape or nothing. I think something like a well chosen Loctite thread lock/sealant (again, avoid high strength adhesives - one day you or someone else will need to undo it) might be appropriate to hold a fitting at the desired point of rotation where this can't be achieved by a locking nut or whatever.
 
Last edited:

LittleSister

Well-known member
Joined
12 Nov 2007
Messages
18,650
Location
Me Norfolk/Suffolk border - Boat Deben & Southwold
Visit site
What did boatbuilders use say backin the 1950s seems very complicated these days

I think there has been a big decline in the familiarity of most people with practical and engineering jobs and techniques, and people are confused (and to some extent deliberately bamboozled) by a plethora of slightly different products and techniques, all claiming to be the ultimate answer to what was never a complicated job in the first place.

I came in towards the end of that era, and unlIke many on the forum, I didn't have a practical father figure to observe or teach me, or engineering type apprenticeship/training to learn from. I did, though, have the dubious benefit of some 'modules' in the university of life pertinent to the matter at hand, often because I never had the money to pay someone who already knew what they were doing to do it properly.

One was trying to keep on the road a series of ancient British motorbikes that had various unsatisfactory arrangements laughably inadequate to their supposed purpose of keeping oil inside the bike. In particular a certain Royal Enfield 250cc which a previous owner's response to the preceding was the application of vastly excessive then newfangled 'liquid gasket', which may have cured some but not all leaks, but almost finished off the bike as bits of excess sealant broke off from time to time and blocked up internal oil ways.

Another 'learning experience', repeated too many times, was trying to remove boat fittings that had inadvisably been applied with strong adhesives, resulting in hours of work, having to cut through perfectly good fittings and then buy repalcements, and/or repair damage such as patches of coachroof gelcoat being pulled off when handrails were removed.

Then there are all the jobs that I did myself and found out both what worked and, all too often, what didn't!

Wooden boats not so many through hulls but I guess a few twists of hemp or other caulking and some soft red lead putty.

There are some amazing products available these days - e.g. adhesives that a few square inches (sic) of could lift the whole boat (if only you could find something on the boat strong enough to apply it to) - for which we may occasionally be very grateful. Most of which, though, should usually be kept far from any boat, but the manufacturers want to sell you some anyway.

Most jobs on a boat, strangely enough, aren't rocket science, and require more in the way of common sense and the practical application of logic than sophisticated techniques or materials.
 

Fr J Hackett

Well-known member
Joined
26 Dec 2001
Messages
66,612
Location
Saou
Visit site
I've lived in a few houses where a previous plumber's use of hemp might explain a thing or two! 😁

I once employed a tiler who was a friend of a friend and came with a warning, the first question he asked as he unpacked his stuff was do you mind if I have a smoke now and again, he didn't smoke Benson and Hedges though. 😁
 

Never Grumble

Well-known member
Joined
29 Sep 2019
Messages
942
Location
England
Visit site
I think there has been a big decline in the familiarity of most people with practical and engineering jobs and techniques, and people are confused (and to some extent deliberately bamboozled) by a plethora of slightly different products and techniques, all claiming to be the ultimate answer to what was never a complicated job in the first place.

I came in towards the end of that era, and unlIke many on the forum, I didn't have a practical father figure to observe or teach me, or engineering type apprenticeship/training to learn from. I did, though, have the dubious benefit of some 'modules' in the university of life pertinent to the matter at hand, often because I never had the money to pay someone who already knew what they were doing to do it properly.
As for the technique of tightening the skin fitting inside nut after curing its what Try Design recommend in their fitting instructions, as is 291I one of the recommended sealant/adhesive. I trained as a shipwright, albeit many moons ago and if it is good enough for the manufacturers then its good enough for me. Generally speaking this is a fit and forget product and 99.9% of owners wont be taking this apart at any time, but if it stops working will be stripped out in its entirety and binned, and replaced.

I'd agree there are more appropriate products for sealing upper deck fittings that need to be moved and in doing so you dont want to pull the gelcoat away.
 

dankilb

Well-known member
Joined
23 Jan 2008
Messages
1,536
Visit site
It’s funny because I’ve had the leak to ‘prove’ the TD threads don’t seal. The ball valve was tightened right down to the backing nut. It wasn’t a biggie - a bucket a day - but leak the threads most definitely did.

I would probably use PTFE if going again - so I’m not advocating for 5331 (or any other ‘plastic thread sealant’) per se. But I can definitely affirm the threads alone don’t always seal!
 

KevinT1

Active member
Joined
23 Nov 2011
Messages
592
Location
Home Noss Mayo, Boat Yealm
Visit site
Sorry to disagree with Little Sister, but both Trudesign and Leeson specify either Sikaflex or Loctite on the threads between the thruhulls and the ball valve.
As another poster has written , they are parallel threads and if you don’t have some form of sealant, then you are going to get leaks.

As for the suggestion of using PTFE tape or Hemp, then surely you are having a laugh At the OPs expense
 

Usangi

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2017
Messages
43
Visit site
All thruhulls and fittings now on, and apart from connecting a few hoses, she’s ready to go back in the water.

Being put back in on 18th so nervous wait until then to see if the thruhulls are bedded in ok and fittings leak proof. Will let you know the outcome!

Thanks again for everyone’s advice
 

vas

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jun 2011
Messages
8,082
Location
Volos-Athens
Visit site
fitted no less than 8 through hull and the matching number of trudesign ball valves 7yrs ago
All thrullhulls using 291i
All ball valves to thruhulls with ptfe tape.

boat in the water all year last I checked lunchtime still floating. What's wrong with ptfe?
 

Usangi

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2017
Messages
43
Visit site
As promised, an update: no leaks. We motored for 3 hours yesterday evening back to our summer harbour spot constantly checking plus we inspected first thing this morning and so far so good.

Not an ideal installation for the reason previously given, so won't relax just yet!

Thanks everyone for the comments and reassurance!
 

Elessar

Well-known member
Joined
10 Jul 2003
Messages
9,997
Location
River Hamble
Visit site
fitted no less than 8 through hull and the matching number of trudesign ball valves 7yrs ago
All thrullhulls using 291i
All ball valves to thruhulls with ptfe tape.

boat in the water all year last I checked lunchtime still floating. What's wrong with ptfe?
Nothing just a bit fiddly in some places.
I use this. Clessetite Thread Sealant 50ml Tube - Clesse UK
Fully removable
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
28,265
Location
Medway
Visit site
Three "proper" boats in 30 years.
Never had cause to replace any seacocks and not a single one of them failed or leaked, No obvious visible indications to suspect fittings had ever been changed on any of the boats.
A couple mild steel handles had rusted away on the newest of the three . Molegrips to the rescue on the bog valves.
Regularly exercised all the valves at least once or twice a year.
Grease and WD40.

However on my latest floating folly .
A survey carried out by the previous owner found that not a single one of the sea cocks on the boat could be closed.
All had to be replaced immediately.
 

dankilb

Well-known member
Joined
23 Jan 2008
Messages
1,536
Visit site
Nothing just a bit fiddly in some places.
I use this. Clessetite Thread Sealant 50ml Tube - Clesse UK
Fully removable
Agreed. There is a bit of a knack to tape (which is second nature to some) and throw in a large diameter thread, awkward access - plus trying to clock the ball valve - then a dedicated thread sealant/jointing compound starts to become an attractive alternative.
 
Top