sailorman
Well-Known Member
The Pilot is there to "advise" ultimate responsibility lays with the skipper
She has a discharde conveyor on the Stb side that should be stowed when under passage. It is about 20 m long so it could take out all the rigging without touching any hull. But you would have to ask.. WTF is someone doing leaving it sticking out?
He doesn't need your permission...
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/medway/news/dredger-damages-yachts-in-early-24283/
Perhaps a change of career!
damage has happened in the past @ Pin Mill & Ipswich above the bridgeThis thread has reminded me of spending nights on the outside moorings at Pinmill and being woken by large ships passing up the Orwell towards Ipswich, I remember at the time being very impressed by the skill of the crew who were able to pilot the, relatively enormous, ship so that it missed my boat by a mere 20 foot or so.
Was I wrong to be impressed? Or are they usually pretty good at missing moored yachts?
I also remember many years ago a large timber ship trying to come alongside Baltic Wharf in the River Crouch and steaming right into Essex Marina, evidently their gearbox failed and they could not stop in time. It was a sunny Sunday morning and a number of boats were damaged.
Ok, that's a clear violation... They have lifted the images from Facebook, and the material has been placed on Facebook via someone calling himself "kent_999". Who has clearly just lifted the images from here... And the licence we agree to here does not extend to syndication for Timeinc and it is not a licence which would allow third parties to lift the material...
Kent_999 has simply stolen the images and out them on his Facebook page, and then kent online has stolen them again...
I would report the infraction to Facebook, who have a reporting function, and should stop it...
As well I would fire off a email to kent online informing them of their infringments...
Which btw are as follows...
2 primary infringments under sections 17 and 18, Copying the work and then issuing copies to the public.
2 secondary infringments under section 23 and 24. Possessing and dealing in infringing copies, and providing a mechanism for the production of mOre infringing copies.
2 further infringments under part 4, Namely section 77 and 84, your right to be identified and false attribution..
Further because they have committed the secondary acts as part of their business the "officers" of the company have committed a criminal act under section 107 and can be held individually liable.
You've taken images which are yours. You have the right to decide how they are used. Some ****er with a Facebook account doesn't, and Kent today are just taking the piss. I would contact facebooks abuse email and get them pulled...
If you are happy for kent today to use the pictures I would contact them and insist on a change of byline to ensure you get credit.
damage has happened in the past @ Pin Mill & Ipswich above the bridge
yes i make sure im well inside away from the channel & Clamp HseI seem to remember that Ipswich APB put out a local requirement for leasure vessels on moorings with crew on board on the Orwell must show an anchor-light overnight. This was after a strike by a ship.
I seem to remember that Ipswich APB put out a local requirement for leasure vessels on moorings with crew on board on the Orwell must show an anchor-light overnight. This was after a strike by a ship.
Wasn't made aware of that when I took on a mooring at Pin Mill although I do leave an anchor light on regardless if I am onboard or not. Not sure how much good it would be in thick fog.
Ok, that's a clear violation...If you are happy for kent today to use the pictures I would contact them and insist on a change of byline to ensure you get credit.
Wasn't made aware of that when I took on a mooring at Pin Mill although I do leave an anchor light on regardless if I am onboard or not. Not sure how much good it would be in thick fog.
Mistakes are made and incidents happen, that's life. What generally makes the difference is how they are dealt with afterwards. Does anyone know if the owners of the various yachts involved came out happy with the way they were treated or did they have to fight for everything....?