Marine toilets/waste tanks/macerators

coopec

N/A
Joined
23 Nov 2013
Messages
5,211
Visit site
I am trying to work out how I will plumb up my toilet/macerator pump/holding tank.

There two systems which seem to be popular but work entirely differently.

Temp toilet.JPG Boat Projects

Temp Toilet ericson yachts.JPG Ericson Yachts

With the Boat Projects system as soon as you've used the toilet you'd press the button to start the macerator pump for a second or so to pump it into the waste tank. Then you'd empty the tank using a diaphragm pump at sea.

Ericson yachts uses the toilet pump to send it to the waste tank or directly out through the skin fitting.

Is anyone aware of the pros and cons of both systems and could express an opinions as to which is best?

Thank you.

Clive
 
Last edited:

pvb

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
45,590
Location
UK East Coast
Visit site
I believe the key to having a good relationship with the holding tank is to design it with the maximum simplicity. The fewer valves, bends, pumps, etc, the better.

There is undoubtedly an advantage in being able to pump the toilet straight out to sea if required.

If you can mount the tank above the waterline, gravity discharge means there's no pump needed.
 

coopec

N/A
Joined
23 Nov 2013
Messages
5,211
Visit site
I agree 100% with your approach to keeping it simple. Unfortunately my holding tank will be below the waterline.
Thanks

Clive
 

MoodySabre

Well-known member
Joined
24 Oct 2006
Messages
17,398
Location
Bradwell and Leigh-on-Sea
Visit site
Mine is below the waterline. There is only one pump and that is a macerator for emptying the tank. The tank empties through a Y connector in to the same seacock as the direct outlet from the pan. A diverter switches between direct and holding tank.
 

moomba

N/A
Joined
29 Jul 2018
Messages
1,380
Location
Glasgow
Visit site
Mine is below the waterline. There is only one pump and that is a macerator for emptying the tank. The tank empties through a Y connector in to the same seacock as the direct outlet from the pan. A diverter switches between direct and holding tank.

Exactly what I have done I have used a whale gulper pump as my toilet is electric with macertor installed so whale pump pumps via y valve to sea cock
I have 2 toilets so lead two feeds into waste tank one pump out to sea cock, but I also have a ball valve at main hose out to y valve to stop any feedback of water to tank unless I'm emptying, this might not be needed depending on your set up
so your set up look good you will just need to pump back to seacock check out the whale gulper toilet waste pump I have one and there pretty good
 
Last edited:

duncan99210

Well-known member
Joined
29 Jul 2009
Messages
6,333
Location
Winter in Falmouth, summer on board Rampage.
djbyrne.wordpress.com
Layout 2 is what I’ve installed on our boat. The head pump moves the waste either to the tank or directly to the sea cock. I don’t have a macerator pump, just a simple diaphragm pump to empty the holding tank. It’s now ten years old and I’m aiming to replace it all with a similar set up next year as the pipes have begun to emit odour, as has the tank. I will probably be replacing the tank with a thick walled one from TekTanks and I’m looking at the idea of using petrol pump hosing rather than the white butyl hosing currently doing the job.
Might also look at fitting a macerator pump between head and tank to clear effluent through the pipe work as well as fitting one on the discharge side, again to assist in clearing pipe work of crap. Two reasons for doing that: reducing the formation of scale and reducing the standing smelly stuff to postpone the odour problems.
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
43,048
Visit site
Two comments.

First you have to decide if you want all your waste to go through the tank or have a direct to sea outlet. If the latter you need to introduce either 2 Y valves or one Y valve and two outlet sea cocks. There are arguments for and against both arrangements. Most macerators have 1" outlets which suggests a dedicated seacock rather than using the main 1 1/2" seacock.

Second with a below waterline tank avoid outlets at the bottom by having a top outlet using a dip tube. Also use a dip tube for the pumpout rather than the external pipe shown in your layouts. Locate your inspection/cleaning hatch so that you can access the end of the dip tubes easily. It is better to have the inlet into the tank on the top rather than the side as it allows you to use the whole capacity of the tank without it flowing back.

Finally keep all runs as short as possible and avoid level runs and particularly dips.
 

moomba

N/A
Joined
29 Jul 2018
Messages
1,380
Location
Glasgow
Visit site
Oops forgot to mention as Above T, has stated I have a Y valve with handle to disperse waste to seacock directly or to waste tank
with both toilets , also don;t get sucked into the marine Y valves and ball valves I looked at spa and out door swimming pool ones and they were very robust and good German quality and low and behold cheaper
 

prv

Well-known member
Joined
29 Nov 2009
Messages
37,361
Location
Southampton
Visit site
Unfortunately my holding tank will be below the waterline.

Aren't you building your own boat? Surely there's a golden opportunity at the design stage to put in a nice tall gravity tank with a straight-down exit directly below a deck fitting - half the benefit of doing it yourself is getting to do these things right instead of being stuck with a production yard's compromises and cost-cutting.

Pete
 

ashtead

Well-known member
Joined
17 Jun 2008
Messages
6,600
Location
Surrey and Gosport UK
Visit site
Holding tanks seem to be a pain in the a***.? Seem to be designed on production boats to block a the drop of a hat . Does a vacuum system not have advantages though? On a normal system the waste just seems to travel through the tank on its journey out and then blockages arise in the tank prior to departure so it's the tank design which fails on what in a direct pipe out would never have an issue?
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
43,048
Visit site
Holding tanks seem to be a pain in the a***.? Seem to be designed on production boats to block a the drop of a hat . Does a vacuum system not have advantages though? On a normal system the waste just seems to travel through the tank on its journey out and then blockages arise in the tank prior to departure so it's the tank design which fails on what in a direct pipe out would never have an issue?

The downsides of a pumped system are twofold. First they usually result in longer pipe runs because the tank is remote from the loo plus more connections and valves. Second they rely (usually) on an electric macerator to empty the tank, although sensible people fit a diaphragm pump such as a Gusher. If you want to see a bad example of such an installation have a look at some of the older Bavaria systems with the tank on the opposite side of the boat from the loo with over 3m of sewage filled pipe running under the cabin sole!

The problem with retrofitting is that there is rarely enough room in the loo compartments to fit a decent size gravity tank, but as Pete says with a new home build like the OP this should be a priority and easily arranged.
 

RupertW

Well-known member
Joined
20 Mar 2002
Messages
10,291
Location
Greenwich
Visit site
I’d echo the support for designing in a good sized gravity tank as a priority. Our two in a production boat will last quite a few people days (8-10?) and could not be simpler as all the waste goes through one pipe to tank and out the bottom to the seacock - no blocks in 8 years.
 

coopec

N/A
Joined
23 Nov 2013
Messages
5,211
Visit site
Thanks for that PVD That website: looks very, very interesting. I'll sit down and study that carefully.
Thanks
 

coopec

N/A
Joined
23 Nov 2013
Messages
5,211
Visit site
Thanks for that Tranona.

Here is my holding tank (one at the front)

IMG_0812.jpg

You can see the markings where I intend cutting an access hole. The "lid" will be 10mm nylon sheet tap screwed/sikaflex 291 to the tank.

It would be a job to get the lid off but I would not expect to do it often

Clive
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
43,048
Visit site
Sorry to say, Clive that is not a good design for a holding tank. I appreciate why it has to be that shape to locate it under the floor, but tanks are much better tall and square.

However your access is in the right place and suggest you put the two dip tubes for the pump out and macerator pick up alongside so they are at the lowest point. Expect to need to inspect and clean that area fairly frequently if you use the tank a lot!. The inlet from the toilet could be on the top face at the far left or right where it will discharge onto the slope.

If you are at a stage where you can still design in a gravity tank would urge you to consider it.
 

coopec

N/A
Joined
23 Nov 2013
Messages
5,211
Visit site
Pete

Aren't you building your own boat? Surely there's a golden opportunity at the design stage to put in a nice tall gravity tank with a straight-do.....

I am building my own boat but to a Bruce Roberts design so I suppose I am retro-fitting it?

Clive
 

coopec

N/A
Joined
23 Nov 2013
Messages
5,211
Visit site
Tranona

If I had room I would have made the tank differently but it is a compromise.

To get rid of the stench and crap build-up in pipes and tank would it be wise to flush the system thoroughly with sea water every so often?

Should I use toilet paper especially designed for marine toilets that dissolves very quickly in water?

Clive
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
43,048
Visit site
Use proper butyl sanitation hose not the cheap plastic type as that is usually porous. Most smells come from hoses. Personally I have never had problems with toilet paper because if you have a Jabsco type toilet it does a good job of breaking everything up before it gets to the tank - even better if you have a macerator type electric toilet. Emptying frequently is good if you can as is introducing fresh water either through the pumpout or for some of the flushing. Using good size dip tubes is important so that it is possible to deal with solids.
 

BabaYaga

Well-known member
Joined
19 Dec 2008
Messages
2,495
Location
Sweden
Visit site
Sorry to say, Clive that is not a good design for a holding tank. I appreciate why it has to be that shape to locate it under the floor, but tanks are much better tall and square.

However your access is in the right place and suggest you put the two dip tubes for the pump out and macerator pick up alongside so they are at the lowest point. Expect to need to inspect and clean that area fairly frequently if you use the tank a lot!. The inlet from the toilet could be on the top face at the far left or right where it will discharge onto the slope.

If you are at a stage where you can still design in a gravity tank would urge you to consider it.

Just to give a contrasting opinion, I see no big problems with the shape of that tank.
Also, I would not recommend dip tubes (which will make it very hard to completely evacuate the tank).
My advise is to locate the exit tube, or rather valve and tube, at the lowest point of side wall. Pump out tube to deck can be taken from a T-fitting between tank and discharge pump.
The inlet tube and vent tube should also be placed centrally, on the side or top panel, to minimize the risk of these filling when to boat heels.
I can also assure you that a holding tank at or below the water line can work really fine.
It seems to me that most people complaining about blockages have gravity tanks. Whether this is because these are more common nowadays or because they are more prone to block, I am not sure...
 
Top