Do you know I can't answer that. I presumed it was to avoid chain twist when circling at anchor.
My set up is exactly like Vyv's on his.
I bought the Kong quite a while back to replace my existing swivel which on comparing is rather light on contruction.
What's your views on them?
I have seen no evidence that a swivel actually untwists chain. The bearing is very crude and it seems most unlikely that a few twists in 30m or more of chain will be sufficient to allow a swivel to rotate. I cannot think of many places where you would develop lots of twists, or you would need to sit at anchor for a long time, only turning one way. The idea that a swivel will allow an anchor to arrive at the bow roller the right way round looks a weak argument. The anchor should rotate as it is lifted and their are simpler and safer ways to ensure the anchor arrives 'right way round' - without any human intervention.
I hear of swivel failure, a few shackle failures and almost no chain failures. Swivels appear to be a weak link.
They fail because of incorrect attachment. The fork being attached directly to the anchor shank. This results in the fork being forced open the end result of which is that the little locking bolt inside the clevis pin can be ripped off. But the clevis pins, being sex bolts (and inherently weak) also fail. Finally the joint in the bearing itself is simply a pin with a retain cap welded on. These are prone to corrosion and simple failure of the pin.
One mystery is why so many people use them, no-one has even heavily promoted swivels but they are almost ubiquitous.
If you must have a swivel then Kong is the best and I have never heard of a bad report.
I am very willing to be shown they, swivels, are essential but have seen no evidence at all.
Jonathan