CJL
Member
From the AINA site: http://www.aina.org.uk/port-of-london-authority.aspx
Sounds like a completely different financing regime to the one the EA operate under.
Well you've gotta start somewhere!
CJL
From the AINA site: http://www.aina.org.uk/port-of-london-authority.aspx
Sounds like a completely different financing regime to the one the EA operate under.
You really should report it not moan about it!
CJL
How about putting the entire thing in private hands.
This would entirely answer the bloated public organisation allegations and allow the UK taxpayer to bail out entirely.
Need a name of course...Virgin Navigation or Windsor and Henley Waterways PLC.
It has been done with gas , electric, gas ,trains, electronic communications and other stuff the Thames would be simple.
Just flog it all off to the great British public.
Franchise each of the locks, Bray ferrinstance could be run by MDL.
Berth holders get free passage,lesser mortals buy a Oyster type card with prepayment for fixed number of lock/journies and rich gits with big Brooms/TransOcean 36 would buy season ticket.
Teddington sponsored by Wonga.
Sonning by WeBuyAnyCar.
All done with Dartag modern 21st century up to date electronics.
Easy to catch back water evaders venturing onto river out of hours.
No Tag. No Lock card....No passage through locks in or out of lockie hours.
Whats not to like.
EA bashers get their favourite organisation culled ,new cutting edge private companies get a chance to sort old problem.
You will be asked to pay commercial rate for the provided facilities,got to think about the shareholders and the money to finance this will probably have a Rouble or Renminbi interest rate to cover. ?
There you are all sorted.
How about putting the entire thing in private hands.
This would entirely answer the bloated public organisation allegations and allow the UK taxpayer to bail out entirely.
Need a name of course...Virgin Navigation or Windsor and Henley Waterways PLC.
It has been done with gas , electric, gas ,trains, electronic communications and other stuff the Thames would be simple.
Just flog it all off to the great British public.
Franchise each of the locks, Bray ferrinstance could be run by MDL.
Berth holders get free passage,lesser mortals buy a Oyster type card with prepayment for fixed number of lock/journies and rich gits with big Brooms/TransOcean 36 would buy season ticket.
Teddington sponsored by Wonga.
Sonning by WeBuyAnyCar.
All done with Dartag modern 21st century up to date electronics.
Easy to catch back water evaders venturing onto river out of hours.
No Tag. No Lock card....No passage through locks in or out of lockie hours.
Whats not to like.
EA bashers get their favourite organisation culled ,new cutting edge private companies get a chance to sort old problem.
You will be asked to pay commercial rate for the provided facilities,got to think about the shareholders and the money to finance this will probably have a Rouble or Renminbi interest rate to cover. ?
There you are all sorted.
Erm excuse me are you suggesting us good folk of Teddington need the help of Wonga? complete mismatch... It needs to be an Estate Agent...
Gascoigne Pees .Lock services to the good boaters of TW11
All des res inc mod cons and with added water features.
Only a massive mortgage required to use our services.
There fixed that for you Fred!
While you are waiting in lock you can have a cup of coffee and peruse their stock of houses.....sorry dwellings.
No doubt have a budget section for your servants with stuff under £1.5M
As I said before there is more time spent point scoring than coming up with constructive suggestions.
You may want to read what the GMB is really about http://www.insidetheenvironmentagency.co.uk/index.php?controller=post&action=view&id_post=62 If this is true you can understand why they do not want to loose 1700 members [Highlight]or is that too obvious?[/Highlight]
At the real risk of being flamed I will kick the ball off ...this is not new stuff
1) Why can't we challenge the payment Water Companies make to the River every year so that at least some of it comes back to Navigation or I think as Boat One suggested take a small percentage of their profits.
2) Why couldn't we franchise the locks, weirs, camp sites, mooring fees to the Resident Lock Keepers, they could manage one lock either side of their lock easily
3) Increase license fees to the rowers including unpowered boats, charge the many regatta's for the work EA puts in at every event.
4) Outsource the collection of fees from unlicensed boats, there are many more unlicensed boats than we all think.
As I said before there is more time spent point scoring than coming up with constructive suggestions.
You may want to read what the GMB is really about http://www.insidetheenvironmentagency.co.uk/index.php?controller=post&action=view&id_post=62 If this is true you can understand why they do not want to loose 1700 members or is that too obvious?
As I said before there is more time spent point scoring than coming up with constructive suggestions.
You may also want to check out the whole site http://www.insidetheenvironmentagency.co.uk/ Given the facts are correct it is high time the EA is opened up for inspection.