maby
Well-Known Member
I agree with your assumption, but what makes a siphon break better at preventing bacteria from going backwards than a closed valve and a check valve?
I think good hygiene, regularly using a suitable anti bacterial cleaner in the toilet helps mitigate any risk. Also, although we treat our water with Aqua Sol every time the tank is filled, which is claimed to kill all water borne bacteria, we don't drink water from the tank other than from the kettle, instead keeping a good supply of bottled water on board for drinking :encouragement:
If I felt there was any risk of contamination of the fresh water supply then I wouldn't do it.
Andy
All valid comments. Personally, I don't like the idea of plumbing the toilet flush into the boat fresh water supply - partly because of the difficulty of ensuring there is no risk of contamination and also because I hate filling the water tanks - which I have to do far too often without flushing half of it back into the marina! Bacteria are little buggars - and viruses even smaller - I'm not sure that I trust even a valve to keep them in their place - far less a simple syphon break!
The value of plumbing in a fresh water flush probably depends on your pattern of boat usage. We spend four to five days of the week on the boat every week and we are really not the victims of much toilet smell. Typically, we arrive at the boat on a Sunday evening and the first flush is smelly, but I put a lot of water through and that clears the smell. The toilet is then used several times per day, every day, and it does not smell at all. We close the boat up on Thurday or Friday and it will smell again on the first flush when we return. I guess that people who use their boats less frequently and for shorter periods will notice the smell more.
We keep our tanks very clean and do drink the water from them unboiled, so it is very important to us to avoid contamination.