PeterWright
Well-Known Member
Out of these two there is no question that the Fulmar is the better boat. She sails way better and has roomier accomodation. This difference is reflected in their relative prices.
However, for the same price as a Fulmar, you can buy a Westerly Storm. 33ft as opposed to 31ft, a bit faster for passage making and much roomier, both on deck and down below. The Storm layout below is also way better than the Fulmar.
She has one of the best galleys you will find in a boat of this size, a superb double forecabin, a separate double aft cabin and the saloon setees make excellent sea berths if you fit lee cloths. At the foot of the companionway, you have direct access to the galley, the large chart table and the heads, without trooping past bunks, which helps to keep the sleeping areas dry on a wet passage.
On deck you have a large cockpit with a space to keep the levers hand out of the way and the genoa sheet winches well inboard for easy access. The cockpit locker is so cavernous that the tendency of owners to fill them up leads to the myth that Storms naturally list to starboard. The side decks are comfortably wide for going forward.
The Fulmar only wins out over the Storm in two ways: smaller berthing fees due to the shorter LOA and, being a fractional rig vs the Storm's masthead rig, she is slightly closer winded. But the Storm still has to give the Fulmar time in a handicap race.
If you're seriously looking to buy any of the three boats, why not get a proud owner of each type to take you for a sail and form your own views?
However, for the same price as a Fulmar, you can buy a Westerly Storm. 33ft as opposed to 31ft, a bit faster for passage making and much roomier, both on deck and down below. The Storm layout below is also way better than the Fulmar.
She has one of the best galleys you will find in a boat of this size, a superb double forecabin, a separate double aft cabin and the saloon setees make excellent sea berths if you fit lee cloths. At the foot of the companionway, you have direct access to the galley, the large chart table and the heads, without trooping past bunks, which helps to keep the sleeping areas dry on a wet passage.
On deck you have a large cockpit with a space to keep the levers hand out of the way and the genoa sheet winches well inboard for easy access. The cockpit locker is so cavernous that the tendency of owners to fill them up leads to the myth that Storms naturally list to starboard. The side decks are comfortably wide for going forward.
The Fulmar only wins out over the Storm in two ways: smaller berthing fees due to the shorter LOA and, being a fractional rig vs the Storm's masthead rig, she is slightly closer winded. But the Storm still has to give the Fulmar time in a handicap race.
If you're seriously looking to buy any of the three boats, why not get a proud owner of each type to take you for a sail and form your own views?