I have just been Alan Mackie'd

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds like a legal threat to Time Inc. Good luck with that, it might end up slightly further up the legal food chain than the Small Claims Court. I am however surprised that either you or Dylan haven't asked for this thread to be pulled.

Don't be silly. this is one thread of many on this site. It costs them nothing in time or expense to pull the plug. They certainly can't be bothered arguing over it, it has no commerical value to them.

> But as a professional litigant you would no doubt know better.

You think such mindless exaggerations are useful?

>Your criminal conviction surely is relevant because it shows you have behaved dishonestly in the past. This is public information that helps us make a judgement about your moral character and fitness to
> disparage others on here.

Dear oh dear. Surely the whole point is that he came on here and attacked me?

> A little humility might go a long way here to softening some attitudes.

Here's my view. I am the victim of an offence. The wronged party. Nothing you have said puts Dylan Winter in the right.

> Why round it off with a general go at sailors,

Ah, I see the problem. you have no sense of humour.

> It's hardly likely to endear you to people.

It was aimed at a few, not many. That was clear from the text to those of us who read it correctly.

> It may be true that there is no such thing as bad publicity, but I think your performance on here might be stretching the axiom.

I can live with it. And I can hand it out as well.
 
Am also surprised no-one has pointed out that we don't know for a fact that the account 197aerial is actually the gentleman concerned and I wonder if this should be considered when choosing what aspects of this issue to discuss.

Now that would be a fun outcome.

You'll note your question has not been answered.

Those who know the truth, shuddup!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top