MedMan
Well-Known Member
Every year without fail I put another two coats of self-eroding antifouling. Despite its name, if doesn't all erode away during a season so twice now since I have owned my boat, I have removed the build-up back to the epoxy coating and started again. The last time I did that was in 2001 so I may well have to think about doing it again in a year or so.
When antifouling costs so much it grieves me to scrape off what has cost so much to put on and it grieves me even more to have to fork out more cash for more antifouling when there is such a decent thickness left on the hull. The rationale, of course, is that the remaining antifouling is 'spent'. It is no longer toxic and it is unable to do its job. But how do we know this is true? The manufacturers tell us so, of course, but then they would, wouldn't they?
Has anyone tried just refreshing the surface of last year's antifouling with wet and dry and re-launching? If so, how did you get on? What type and how old was the antifouling and how long had the boat been out of the water? How long was the boat back in the water after launching?
When antifouling costs so much it grieves me to scrape off what has cost so much to put on and it grieves me even more to have to fork out more cash for more antifouling when there is such a decent thickness left on the hull. The rationale, of course, is that the remaining antifouling is 'spent'. It is no longer toxic and it is unable to do its job. But how do we know this is true? The manufacturers tell us so, of course, but then they would, wouldn't they?
Has anyone tried just refreshing the surface of last year's antifouling with wet and dry and re-launching? If so, how did you get on? What type and how old was the antifouling and how long had the boat been out of the water? How long was the boat back in the water after launching?