tillergirl
Well-known member
The Courts are based on the UK 'model' (60's style) so will be public.
......We are left with what seems much the most probable explanation - loss of situational awareness by the Officer of the Watch. The coast line appears low lying so there would be few visual indicators of position, and the coast line would not return a good radar echo. GPS would operate normally, though.
At this point a question occurs - did the ship download the dongle for the largest scale charts for the area of the Mauritius coast that she was planning to close? If we assume that the ship was closing the coast to get a cellphone signal - something that is very commonly done, but not usually with the owners’ or managers’ approval - then the cost of the large scale BA charts for somewhere where the ship wasn’t meant to be would show up in the ship’s accounts and the superintendent might have had a small sense of humour failure. (The charts are pre-loaded; you buy the dongle for each chart and download that over satellite).
Just possibly, the 2/O might have decided not to spend the money, but to rely on the large scale charts. I don’t know this - I am speculating....
I know just enough about how charts and scaling works to know how little I know, but it does seem to me that it shouldn't be beyond the realms of possibility to design charts to show all depths less than, say, 20m, at all scales, even if we show a 20m reef as a mile wide at the smallest scale, getting more accurate as you zoom in. Can anyone with real knowledge tell me why this can't be done? Sure there's a cost implication, but the cost of putting a ship on unmarked rocks seems to me to have certain cost implications too.
Don't most vessels nowadays have satcoms thereby negating the need to close the shore to get a wifi signal?While obviously speculation, the cellphone theory is intriguing !
Don't most vessels nowadays have satcoms thereby negating the need to close the shore to get a wifi signal?