numenius
New member
In the March PBO there was an article called Hoseclip Horror where a mechanic at a Belgian yard had refitted old galvanised hoseclips following some work, with the inevitable leaky result. I read the story, but didn't think much more about it - after all, I do all my own work on my boat with the minor exception of last year when since work was being done under an insurance claim (damage done on land by someones vehicle!), I also got a local yard to at the same time fit my outdrive with new water inlet pipe, and exhaust and drive bellows. I knew these had proper stainless steel (as are all the interior ones as well) jubillee clips. For various reasons, the boat never went anywhere off the mooring last year, but I've got her out of the water and am servicing the engine, drive etc ready for next year. Imagine my surprise then to find that not only did the water inlet hose clip come off in my hand before I began to unscrew it, but that the exhaust bellows clip was fitted diagonaly and was holding on by about a quarter inch only.
The picture is here:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/boaty1965/03100.jpg
you can see the groove where the clip "just" was on.
Okay, so maybe I too had a dodgy continental "mechanic" with different standards?.... No, this particular bit of sloppy work was carried out at British a yard which charges the earth, and boasts of being RNLI contractors!!! (maybe touting for work for the RNLI, by keeping them busy?). I guess theres a moral here to check all work - but to view this, I needed the boat out of the water. Also, if we need to check work (which was charged at TOP whack as well I might add) on even basic jobs like this, then surely this defeats the whole point of paying "professionals"? In this particular case, a leak would maybe not have been fatal (though a possible inlet blockage could have resulted due to cooling water bypassing the leg strainer - which has been the end of many a motor boat of course), but it does make you wonder who you can rely on apart from yourself - cost seems to be no guide, and the RNLI contractor bit CERTAINLY made me expect higher standards.
http://members.lycos.co.uk/boaty1965/index.htm
The picture is here:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/boaty1965/03100.jpg
you can see the groove where the clip "just" was on.
Okay, so maybe I too had a dodgy continental "mechanic" with different standards?.... No, this particular bit of sloppy work was carried out at British a yard which charges the earth, and boasts of being RNLI contractors!!! (maybe touting for work for the RNLI, by keeping them busy?). I guess theres a moral here to check all work - but to view this, I needed the boat out of the water. Also, if we need to check work (which was charged at TOP whack as well I might add) on even basic jobs like this, then surely this defeats the whole point of paying "professionals"? In this particular case, a leak would maybe not have been fatal (though a possible inlet blockage could have resulted due to cooling water bypassing the leg strainer - which has been the end of many a motor boat of course), but it does make you wonder who you can rely on apart from yourself - cost seems to be no guide, and the RNLI contractor bit CERTAINLY made me expect higher standards.
http://members.lycos.co.uk/boaty1965/index.htm