Hero to Zero!

Re: YM or not YM

I absolutely agree that a qualification, having gained wide, if not universal, acceptance, cannot, and should not, be continually tampered with. Furthermore, if I am following your point fully, I am also in agreement that we may well be debating repairs to something that ain't broke. The relatively small number of rookie YMs embarking on major voyages is probably so low that it would not stand up to statistical analysis, so it would be very difficult to assess (I should think that the MCA / RYA and other bodies world wide do try though).

We all tend to jump to conclusions, ie. when a rookie has an accident and is tragically unable to explain the circumstances, insufficient experience is the thought that immediately springs to mind, conversely, when this sort of thing has happened to an "old hand" we tend to think that he was "overwhelmed by freak conditions".

I do stand by my comment regarding the responsibility of employers to make a reasonable assessment of an "employee's" capacities prior to packing him/her off on some jaunt and a Ym fastrack may well provide a satisfactory assessment. All That I can liken it to is my own situation, I have people working for me who arrive with the appropriate qualifications, but that does not mean that I can confidently send them to work in certain industrial conditions without further training / supervision. I am not, for one minute, suggesting that the young man involved in the incident which started this thread had not been properly vetted, in fact, the point that I am trying to convey, is that his employers must have been satisfied that he was, in all reasonability, capable of undertaking this passage safely.

As in all matters it is a question of where do you draw the line and say that this person is now ready to undertake this task. As you say, qualified structural engineers do build bridges that fall down, and accidents do happen, and there ain't nuffin we're going to do that will prevent it. All we can do is make sure that training ensures that people are reasonably prepared for the task at hand.





<hr width=100% size=1>Think I'll draw some little rabbits on my head, from a distance they might be mistaken for hairs.
 
$hit happens ,especially at sea.None of us are in a position to comment on the skippers experience or judgement.

If he had surfed into the harbour and expertly slotted the boat into a berth we would never have heard about it. As it is a wave caught them wrong and the rest is history.

Age is not the question.Look at the armed forces.Almost all the frontline officers and NCOs are under 30.



<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Re: YM or not YM

"a job to skipper a boat up to 100GRT (i think)" -
a Commercially Endorsed YM, is able to skipper up to 200 tons or 24 metres, whichever is the lesser.
Also restricted (as skipper) to Category 1 -up to 150 miles from a safe haven. Only YM Ocean & above, are able to operate in Category 0 - Worldwide. (maybe Reliance can comment on this).
Regarding the Biscay incident mentioned in the start of this thread, from memory, the skipper was basing his departure on weather information which he thought viable. The local French Harbour Master issued another forecast which was contrary. The incident occured because they turned back into treacherous waters & were rolled by the waves.
Unfortunate decision maybe, but to castigate this guy as inexperienced or 0 - H is a load of "b-----ks", since all the reports suggested that he (young maybe) was well experienced.
On the subject of zero - hero, perhaps you could also say the same about the real heros in eg the RAF in WW11. They didn't have much experience either (& they were younger), but we are grateful now.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Re: YM or not YM

The point I can't resolve in my mind is that a new boat was SUPPLIED with only two reefs to cross the Atlantic. They appear to have been running before the wind in bad seas with only the main up and the boat broached.
If I am a commercial delivery skipper how popular would I be if I refused to sail poorly specified boats across the Atlantic and presumably others have delivered similar boats to similar destinations. Is it necessary for a delivery skipper to examine the full specification (say on paper) and for boats that are not new a condition survey before accepting a delivery contract.
While many of us hate regulation is it not reasonable to expect a new boat to have 3 reefs.
I am purposely ignoring any observation as whether running with a Genoa and not the main would have been better as this skipper sadly lost his life and I do not think it reasonable (we do not know enough about the conditions) to presume to make more informed decisions from the comfort of our armchairs.



<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Re: YM or not YM

from what I can gather the boat was rolled by a large breaking wave in shallowing water as it approached Sable d'ollone (sp) 1reef or 19 reefs would not have helped, the crux issues were 1)Weather Forecasts 2) Approaching a "dodgy" port in these conditions .. all other matters were IMHO red herrings re this particular incident.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Re: YM or not YM

Ah, but the boat isn't supplied to cross the atlantic, its supplied to cruise in the Caribbean. If its windy enough for three reefs out there then the boat wouldn't be out, and it wouldn't suprise me if the charter guests didn't even know what a reef was! They make the solent Sunsail lot look like well seasoned racers.

With regards to reviewing the spec/survey before accepting a delivery contract, the skippers do know what to expect from the boat, but its a very competitive industry, so they accept that the kit the boats come with isn't specified for ocean crossing. For example, there isn't a liferaft or EPIRB or flares, the skipper has to bring his own.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
I think the point that is missed is that no Z2H qualifier walks out of UKSA or any other school and into a job as a skipper in charge of a commercial yacht.

I have a 23 year old at home who did one of these courses. With a newly held commercially endorsed YM he started off as a 2nd mate then did a season in the Med as a first mate and a season racing in the Carib as a first mate, all on sixty five footers. He is now back in UK waters as a second mate on the bigger yachts and doing some work on 38 footers as skipper.

It is a buyers market out there and experience that counts as well as the qualification.

A Z2H is a bit like a degree, they are pretty much the starting point and having one only puts you on the bottom rung. It is what else you have done that counts.

<hr width=100% size=1>
smallsnail.gif
 
Re: YM or not YM

I have to agree here.

The skipper was a friend of a friend and, as I understand it, had plenty of miles and experience under his belt.

Having worked for a delivery company myself and seen what can happen when things go really wrong I object to this "speaking poorly of the dead".

I read the reports and they seemed not to have all of the facts, also, Reliance commented that the report was not in line with their findings.

It was a tragedy and awful for all concerned and the guy's family.

How many of us, very experienced yachtsman, have been lucky more than once. I know I have several times when it could have gone horribly wrong but hasn't.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing...

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top