Has my love affair with the Thames started to wane........

BG1

Well-Known Member
Joined
31 Aug 2006
Messages
121
Location
Hampshire, uk
Visit site
I've been boating on the Thames for more than 37 years.

When I managed to buy the boat of my dreams over 21yrs ago, it was fantastic, even though I was up to my neck in debt. When the BSS was introduced, I felt this was bureaucracy too far, and I changed fresh water for salt and found new cruising grounds on the south coast.

But alas, I couldn't keep up with MDL's business plan of squeezing every last penny out of the boater, so I returned to the Thames, bit the bullet, and spent hundreds of pounds converting a very seaworthy boat into a very riverworthy boat.

I now find myself at a crossroads again. I'm accepting the licence fees increase, I'm accepting the reduced level of service, (working the locks myself), I'm even accepting our fellow river visitors from the canals (through clenched teeth), but now I find I can't moor in places that previously were always OK.

Marsh Meadow at Cookham has been dodgy for depth for some time if you can't get the right spot. I found that out earlier in the year with my brand new shiny props, when they started to plough the bankside gravel.

Now I find even Bell Rope Meadow is shallow and wants to reprofile my props.

With the increased cost of fuel looming, (although it's pretty horrific at present), I think my sea cruising days are over, the river is too restrictive, either flood or drought, so I'm thinking maybe a coastal harbour would be better.

Chichester or Poole spring to mind, sheltered water, so low(ish) fuel consumption, but near enough to the open sea for a quick burst to clear the cylinders (and reinstate the smile). No river licence just an inflated marina fee and increased travelling time and costs, but I am considering it.

What would you do? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
I'm sure you'll hate me for this, but:

Try buying a boat which is suitable for River use.
It needs to be under 25' long, so cheap to moor, have three storeys to offer good accomodation, have a draught of under 12" and an engine which can be extended a little at under 5mph.

Obviously, such a vessel doesn't exist, but if you start saving now, who knows? /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
 
My boat hasn't changed, I used to be able to afford fuel, I used to be able to moor anywhere, I still love my boat. Its the river thats changed.

I forgot to mention the filth my fenders now pick up in locks, because they're not cleaned any more, all because some moron got a spec of caustic in his eye for not wearing safety gear.

Oh, and as you say, I hate you. /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif (not really)
 
Us little guys are fine..

Well under a gallon an hour, eighteen inch draught, not too badly affected by rising costs, and ready to rock n'roll on the non-tidal parts for the forseeable future.

As lovely as they are, methinks your floating hotels have some significant shortcomings under these circumstances, and IU can't see anything in life getting better.

Enjoy life while you can Gentlemen, it will never be this good.

No, really.... /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif
 
These are the same comments I made some weeks ago on this forum, with I must say some sarcastic irrelevant replies. I am currently in battle with Eileen McKeever and John Harman Chairman of the EA who sadly have both stated to me that there are no problems on the river. There are no shallows, no unlicenced boats in use etc etc. With an attitude such as theirs, the river will contimue it's sad but steady decline.
 
So all the big stuff on the South coast will be heading onto the Thames to keep fuel/berthing costs down and all you Thames lot are heading outside because of err.......overcrowding BSS berthing costs and stuff.
Do wave to each other as you pass. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
Do wave to each other as you pass. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Excellent (c:

Of course waving may have its own issues if you read DAKA's post here
 
Nothing wrong with the boat, fuel consumption is only half a gall per hour per engine. At least when we are confined to our moorings, the boat has space to move around.

The problem is the tossers running the river, who take more money each year and deliver a worsening service.

The £600 a year wasted on these losers, could be added towards a more expensive mooring on the coast.
 
"The £600 a year wasted on these losers"

For the exorbitant sum of £1.69 pence a day you get to navigate 140 miles of some of the most beautiful country in the land through some of the most expensive real estate anywhere .You get god knows how many staff to hold your hand on every single dangerous yard of it.
You get excellent public moorings at wonderful locations the rest of the boaty world cannot even dream some for less than the price of a gallon of diesel.
Your daily contribution works out at .038 of a penny per lock per day and still you are not happy with your lot in life.
/forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 
Jeez I never realised it was such a bargain, thankyou for bringing it to my attention!

According to their 20 year plan, the EA are going to up your licenses on that muddy ditch you float on to the same rates, so no doubt you will welcome the chance to pay more too!

/forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 
Bargain indeed, until you start working out how many days you actually use the river - allowing, for flooding, lock closures, having to work for a living etc.

Often think it would be cheaper to just buy a daily license for the days I actually get out on the river but I think its only visitors that are allowed to do that?

Still at least I haven't got to worry about paying for a license until 2010!

Darren.
 
Regretably my "church mouse" boating budget precludes anything other than an occasional foray up the upper Merdeway or even olde Father Thames.
A salty mudberth is our home with a nice view of the timber wharf opposite to complete the idyll. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 

Other threads that may be of interest

Top