justanothersailboat
Well-Known Member
I really do have a strong impression that Westerly were a bit more fastidious with the Fulmar in terms of pads on load items, glassing over more of the backs of things and so forth... than on older or smaller or lower end models. Which would make sense given higher loads. But then, most of the Westerlys I've seen in pieces are older or smaller ones.
The practice of glassing over the undersides of nuts and pads is a bit "what on earth were they thinking" - it must have cost a lot in labour, it makes stuff hard to fix, and each prevented drip is a trapped drip slowly wrecking the pad. I replaced a few ply pads without re-glassing, but would use G10 next time, or build new solid glass myself as I have elsewhere.
They certainly didn't glass over *everything* in every model. I think they must have been pretty inconsistent - in another thread here someone described faults in his dad's old Griffon that mine certainly never had, but mine has different ones. And later Merlins, Tempests etc have loads of detail design differences.
As you say, it's pretty good that these boats are able to be kept going aged 40-50. They're pretty malleable.
The practice of glassing over the undersides of nuts and pads is a bit "what on earth were they thinking" - it must have cost a lot in labour, it makes stuff hard to fix, and each prevented drip is a trapped drip slowly wrecking the pad. I replaced a few ply pads without re-glassing, but would use G10 next time, or build new solid glass myself as I have elsewhere.
They certainly didn't glass over *everything* in every model. I think they must have been pretty inconsistent - in another thread here someone described faults in his dad's old Griffon that mine certainly never had, but mine has different ones. And later Merlins, Tempests etc have loads of detail design differences.
As you say, it's pretty good that these boats are able to be kept going aged 40-50. They're pretty malleable.