GPS and RADAR ANTENNAE

Re: Urban myth...

Hmm... Yes interesting, and having now read more I accept your point, the higher the scanner the worse the clutter. Lets see what it actually means. Having done a few calcs I think taking the nominal 7 degree brewster angle previously mentioned and assuming the vessel remains upright (mines a cat) means the difference between mounting at 4 metres above WL and 12 metres is that at 4 metres the clutter can be expected to cover a 57 metre radius around the yacht where at 12 metres this becomes 171 metres. In practice with a vertical beamwidth of 25 degrees it will extend further than this but this is the nominal centre of the beam. Personally I can live with that especially as my sea clutter filter tunes it out. Assuming the antennae is 60 metres high on a ship though this becomes 858 metres which is significant and on top of matey's cliff (what 200 metres?) it would become 2860 metres. I can see that that would be a problem.
The other side of the problem however is how far can my radar see?
Taking the old formula of Distance in Nm at sea level = 1.144 x height in feet a scanner at say 12 ft would have a horizon of 13 miles. one at 35 ft = 40 miles.
As the maximum range of most yachtie radars is probably about 24 miles the optimum height for the scanner would be 20 ft I guess giving a full range of 24 miles at sea level and a nominal sea clutter radius of 95 yds. Obviously in practice the radar will see objects further than this as the top of a tanker ain't at sea level, but to get a strong echo from its hull it's still advantageous to see more of it especially at extreme range. Apologies for mixing my units but I can't be bothered to convert.
Is that fair? Please feel free to question my logic but I think that means that a radar on an arch is not at the optimum height, but there is no point in going above 20 ft. Mine therefore is higher than it needs to be but basically lives there to miss everything else so I won't move it.
I shall now go and do my late Chrissie shopping and return later to see who thinks I am talking bollox or can't count!
 
Bollox...

[ QUOTE ]
The other side of the problem however is how far can my radar see? Taking the old formula of Distance in Nm at sea level = 1.144 x height in feet a scanner at say 12 ft would have a horizon of 13 miles. one at 35 ft = 40 miles..... I shall now go and do my late Chrissie shopping and return later to see who thinks I am talking bollox or can't count!

[/ QUOTE ]Yes, boatmike, it's bollox again I'm afraid! Distance to the horizon is 1.144 x the square root of the height in feet. So at 12ft, the scanner would see the horizon at about 4 miles, and at 35ft it would see the horizon at about 7 miles.
 
Re: Bollox...

Oh booger.... just looked it up and of course you are right again. /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif Remembered the number and forgot the root (doh!) so in that case the required height to see the horizon at 24 miles is 441ft? (impossible to achieve of course on a yacht) Even mine at about 35 ft can only see the horizon at 6.77 miles? I am getting even happier that it is that high now! Does that mean that when I get a strong return at 12 miles (which I do) it must be over 20 ft high? I suppose so! (assuming that radar can't see around corners).
In which case we come back to the original point, which is mounting radar as high as possible up the mast (assuming the weight is not a problem and it doesn't get in the way of anything) is a good thing and sunshine should mount his radar as high as possible up the mast and put his GPS on the arch instead. So I guess this makes me right for all the wrong reasons does it not assuming you agree with my calcs on the 7 degree thing?
/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Hi, I have just fitted a new plotter, and before fitting the antenna, I tried it in different locations around the boat. The signal strength according to the satellite status screen was the same on deck as down below, so I made a bracket that holds the antenna up under the side deck near the chart table, seems to work fine, not tried at sea yet as the boat is out for winter, but that's where it will stay provided it works ok when moving.

Peter
 
Phew! I read your post wrongly at first and thought you meant radar!! That would double as a microwave oven mounted like that!! However you mean GPS... and yes if you can get a good signal like that there is no reason why not. there are a number of people using PCs with USB GPS inside the boat. Go with what works.
 
The radome is on the mast, just above the spreaders. I spent a lot of time deciding on where to mount it, but on a small boat, a pole at the stern just didn't seem right, and then a brand new scanstrut mast mount on ebay for 25 pounds clinched it!

Peter
 
Re: Urban myth...

[ QUOTE ]
answer only from those who can program their own VCR at home, please.

[/ QUOTE ]

Now we're talking steam-driven electrickery..... /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif I gave up VCR stuff along with flares and 'big hair' sometime last century! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

So, yes, we're very broadly in agreement. Nonetheless, It's my 'last century' pro nav training that reminds me to keep identifying and reducing possible sources of error, and not just keep accepting an error-process we ( me 'n you ) cannot quantify. It's a pro-skills habit which, although out of fashion, still gets the nod from other professionals. And I believe it is one of those habits that, once or twice in a lifetime, saves my sad ass from bad embarrassment or worse.

As for the "Now Bilbo, you don't mean the "greatest possible respect , do you?", this is so, but you may not be aware that there has been something of a jihad against the use of the convenient, courteous and previously-innocent 'IMHO', so I tried to avoid some dire retribution and embassy-burning! I trust you, as an English gentleman, will understand the imperative to avoid giving unwitting offence to some of the unlettered radicals that come on here, instead of Al-Jazeera. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

However, and while I certainly would not take issue with your view that most on here couldn't plot a given position to within an elephant's todger of real life on the Geoid, the fact remains that you, your advisers and attendants, your outer court, hangers-on and supplicants cannot derive an accurate, reliable, repeatable calculated position from the current constellation of Navstar/GPS within a 2metre 2RDMS centroid on the planet , if you were holding it by the door-handle. Unless, of course, you employ the services of a highly-specialised and rather expensive, validated and authorised specialist US survey company to do it for you.

Try 6-20 metres. On a good day. That's what the industry and the RIN have to say on the matter. All else is sales talk......

....as they say, down the ages, with justification, "Put your faith in lead, log and lookout. Of these, the last is supreme."

Enjoi!


/forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
 
Re: Urban myth...

I think I qualify on being able to programme a vcr, or even sort out a multitude of computer problems posted here or pm'd to me.

Yes, I've experienced gps positions and supersonic velocities on my gps. Once for instance while at anchor in Studland bay, my position went off at about 900knts to a position somewhere a few miles inland. No particular reason, but I've seen it happen a few times, and have posted about it previously. Usually happens at anchor, or berthed, than when travelling
 
Re: Urban myth...

Well thats interesting Brendan - I can honestly say that I've never seen anything like it, though I have seen some funnies when near boats from the grey funnel line and / or our American cousins. Could it be that a warship was nearby or maybe it's just that Bilbo's elephants todger was close to your bit of the Geoid at that particular moment.

Reminds me , incidentally, that one of the exhibits in the Museum of Welsh Life is a bull's todger, suitably dried out, and which was at one time used instead of a truncheon by a Welsh police force. That too probably suffered from multiple path errors Bilbo but I still wouldnt like it near my geoid.
 
Re: Urban myth...

On the occasions it's happened to me, there have been no warships or anything of the sort nearby. Just the odd glitch you expect with any electronic system
 
Top