James_Calvert
Well-Known Member
If I'm on mobile view the poll is hidden and I can't tick anything. Like now...29 views but only six people bother to reply....
It's not compulsory but hardly a lot of effort to tick a button.
If I'm on mobile view the poll is hidden and I can't tick anything. Like now...29 views but only six people bother to reply....
It's not compulsory but hardly a lot of effort to tick a button.
I assumed that the OP meant "litres per annum" and I've replied in the "80 to 160" bracket. I think we are borderline and may nudge over to the "160 to 320" bracket - depends very much on how cold and long the winter is - a lot of what we purchase goes into the heater...
I am interested from the PoV of exactly how much the extra tax on fuel would actually deliver to the hard pressed exchequer.
What a daft question! It's obviously per minuteYou need to clarify the timescales - is this consumption per hour, per day or per year![]()
If this were a school assignment, the poster fails. No units were given, and you NEVER assume.
I assume you mean the OP
Incidentally, my maths and physics lecturers couldn’t get through a lesson without using “let us assume” multiple times when considering the possible consequences of a potential situation!
The handful of users who can read noticed that the OP mentioned litres, or at least 'l', in his blurb, and young master savage has blotted his copybook by sticking to the thread.I assume you mean the OP
Incidentally, my maths and physics lecturers couldn’t get through a lesson without using “let us assume” multiple times when considering the possible consequences of a potential situation!
The handful of users who can read noticed that the OP mentioned litres, or at least 'l', in his blurb, and young master savage has blotted his copybook by sticking to the thread.
My university maths lecturer was incapable of adding two numbers together and reliably getting the right answer - he used to refer to anything that used numbers as "arithmetic" and pointing out that a pocket calculator could do it far better than almost any human. Mathematics, he would explain, was about the behaviour of numbers, not the numbers themselves - and numbers behave the same irrespective of the units.
Me too!Oh for heavens sake, I was joking! I know the first post stated liters and the context was obvious. Just joking!