pagoda
Well-Known Member
I'm basically new to this game - and working through several seacocks the surveyor described as stiff...
Anyway, I have read through quite a few threads on the merits of ball valves / gate valves / Blakes style valves etc. And all sorts of arguments about alloys. Almost too much info /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
I also came across the Marelon range of valves, which look pretty effective. They exist as seacocks -complete with skin fittings, and also as discrete valves with BSP & other connections.
If I have a couple of existing seacock valves (BSP threads) needing replaced, I would prefer not to have to dismantle the skin fittings unless I have to.
Is it acceptable technically to replace only the faulty valve mechanism by the equivalent Forespar valve -with the same threaded connections?
Do I have to ditch otherwise sound skin fittings as well?
I'm sure somebody else has had the same idea- any thoughts appreciated.
Graeme
Anyway, I have read through quite a few threads on the merits of ball valves / gate valves / Blakes style valves etc. And all sorts of arguments about alloys. Almost too much info /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
I also came across the Marelon range of valves, which look pretty effective. They exist as seacocks -complete with skin fittings, and also as discrete valves with BSP & other connections.
If I have a couple of existing seacock valves (BSP threads) needing replaced, I would prefer not to have to dismantle the skin fittings unless I have to.
Is it acceptable technically to replace only the faulty valve mechanism by the equivalent Forespar valve -with the same threaded connections?
Do I have to ditch otherwise sound skin fittings as well?
I'm sure somebody else has had the same idea- any thoughts appreciated.
Graeme