FM200 fire extinguisher overcharged

DavidJ

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 Jun 2001
Messages
5,984
Location
home in Brum. S37 sold, was in Med Spain.
Visit site
D3-C420-CB-38-A7-4-E6-A-955-F-C6-C498-AD46-A4.jpg


My Seafire FM200 engine bay extinguisher is showing slightly overcharged. I note that the green bit assumes 70*F (21*C)
It’s now 31*C here. Could this account for the higher reading?
 
When a gas is trapped inside a container which has a fixed size (its volume cannot change) and the gas is heated, the particles will gain kinetic energy which will make them move faster.

The temperature of the gas is proportional to the average kinetic energy of its molecules. Faster moving particles will collide with the container walls more frequently and with greater force. This causes the force on the walls of the container to increase and so the pressure increases.

If the temperature of the gas is measured on the Kelvin scale, the pressure is proportional to the temperature.

From this we can derive the equation

\frac{P_{1}}{T_{1}} = \frac{P_{2}}{T_{2}}
 
Could this account for the higher reading?[/QUOTE]
Yes.
My Seafire extinguisher gauge shows a low reading in the winter, which is also normal.
 
Hi mcanderson I was hoping you would reply. I remember your earlier excellent accounts on this subject.
Can I trouble you to do the maths for me
240 psi at 21*C what is the pressure at 31*C
7.1 cu M capacity
4.95 Kg FM200
 
Last edited:
Sorry you need to know the temp of the gas. I think it is simple enough to say that the higher temp has resulted in your gauge showing a higher reading and you can return to a normal state of being.
 
Many thanks
I will keep an eye on it when the ambient temperature returns to “normal” later in the year
If I assume the gas temp is the same as me at the moment ie 31 then I calculate the pressure to be 248 psi using p1v/t1=p2v/t2
Regards
David
 
Last edited:
But in this case, isn't the gas in a container which will also expand in the heat, and hence increase the volume within it? Therefore the calculation of the pressure of the gas is, presumably, more complex.

Sure, but the expansion of steel over 10oC is really really tiny. Without delving into the specific steel used, its reasonable to use a linear coeficient of 11x10-6/oC so your extinguisher bottle might be about 1.00011 times a long and wide for a 10oC temperature rise.
 
Yes its pressure is rising due to the temperature.

However, no it is not overcharged, it is simply a refrigerant grade fluid (R227EA) with liquid and vapour both present sitting at its saturated pressure for its given temperature (for a static single component fluid in a sealed cylinder the liquid is at its boiling point and the gas above it is at its condensing point, but there is no bubbling, nor condensing, the fluid is simply stable).

The only danger arises when a cylinder is overcharged with liquid alone, no gas space above, leaving no expansion room in which case temperature expansion alone of a trapped liquid can cause an immense rise in pressure sufficient to burst a cylinder. Your simple gauge would be off the scale.

It will rarely see 31oC, but when it does its pressure will rise so this then enters the red zone on the very simple indicator gauge. But if you look closely at the gauge the overcharge zone begins at 130oF or 54.4oC when the bottle pressure will rise to 9.94 bar. These actual pressures are quite modest. At 31oC it is not that much higher than a typical cycle tyre ~4.5 bar. The discharge from your fridge will be getting up to 15 bar on a warm day.

The saturated pressure of FM200 AKA R227EA is ...

0oC 0.93 bar
10oC 1.78 bar
20oC. 2.89 bar
30oC 4.31 bar
31oC 4.47 bar
35oC. 5.14 bar

I would expect the cylinder you have there would have a burst pressure around 150 bar or probably higher. You are not getting anywhere close.
 
Thanks superheat, most reassuring.
I was inspired to post this from one of your earlier explanations of overcharge problems which as I understood was critical for other mediums, not FM200.
I didn’t like to just ignore my gauge in case I hadn’t quite understood the chemistry/physics/mathematics.
Cheers
David
 
Top