Floating voters: How living on a boat meant I didn't officially 'exist'

Jeva

Member
Joined
24 Jan 2011
Messages
182
Visit site
For those of you/us living on board all the year or saiing slowly around the world, have you tried renewing your SSR recently - in a nutshell, you're an alien.
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,137
Visit site
For those of you/us living on board all the year or saiing slowly around the world, have you tried renewing your SSR recently - in a nutshell, you're an alien.

No, you are not. You have to be resident in the UK, but not necessarily a UK citizen. Remember the whole purpose of the SSR was to provide a simple method of identification for UK based boats so that they could visit (mainly) France and comply with local requirements. You no longer seem to fall into that category. While the policing has been lax in the past there have been changes aimed at reducing the misuse of the system and bring it back to its original purpose.
 

ChattingLil

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2009
Messages
3,395
Location
Boats in Essex and London
Visit site
A quick read of the article confirms what I suspected: the author doesn't have a proper residential mooring. Difficulties with officialdom are inevitable when you break the rules like that. Tough

Isn't that her whole point? It doesn't matter what your situation is - you shouldn't need to have a 'proper residential mooring' to exercise your right to vote.
 

jerrytug

N/A
Joined
31 May 2006
Messages
3,775
Location
Lorient
Visit site
Isn't that her whole point? It doesn't matter what your situation is - you shouldn't need to have a 'proper residential mooring' to exercise your right to vote.

Exactly, 90% of boat dwellers don't have a 'proper residential mooring', should it be routine that the many thousands of them routinely have 'trouble with the authorities'?
 

macd

Active member
Joined
25 Jan 2004
Messages
10,604
Location
Bricks & mortar: Italy. Boat: Aegean
Visit site
I'm not familiar with many UK institutions any more, but is there still such a thing as a local government ombudsman? The response of Lois Pryce's local authority is clearly one of maladministration (compare it to Sassan's experience with his LA, in 'Comments'). Given the weight rightly attached to the right to vote, correct that: gross maladministration.
 

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
Why are they " inevitable"?

The problems encountered by canal dwellers without residential moorings - whether genuine continuous cruisers or rule-breakers like the author of the article - are well documented. In the case of registering to vote it is perfectly reasonable that proof of residence in a particular constituency should be needed, as otherwise there would be clear opportunities for fraud.
 

macd

Active member
Joined
25 Jan 2004
Messages
10,604
Location
Bricks & mortar: Italy. Boat: Aegean
Visit site
The problems encountered by canal dwellers without residential moorings - whether genuine continuous cruisers or rule-breakers like the author of the article - are well documented. In the case of registering to vote it is perfectly reasonable that proof of residence in a particular constituency should be needed, as otherwise there would be clear opportunities for fraud.

1. There are more places to moor than canals, and very different rules in force on them.
2. So because of the possibility of fraud by parties unknown, people who are entitled to vote but don't have a conventional address should be disenfranchised?
3. Whatever judgement one might make on '2', it is clear that the law does make provision for people of no fixed address being accepted on the electoral roll. Local authorities which contrive to subvert this are, by my reckoning, guilty of maladministration.
 

rivonia

Active member
Joined
22 Sep 2008
Messages
3,248
Location
on the move as live aboard
Visit site
As I have allready stated. If you have lived at a residential address in the UK with a registered post code. You can register to vote as long as you have not been away from that address for more than 15 years. Look it it up it is in the rules and regulations for voters. Try google. //www.gov.uk/register-to-vote this is the site.
 
Last edited:

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
1. There are more places to moor than canals, and very different rules in force on them.

True, but this case is about a canal dweller.

2. So because of the possibility of fraud by parties unknown, people who are entitled to vote but don't have a conventional address should be disenfranchised?

No, but they can expect it to be difficult to prove a connection with a constituency. Perhaps there should be an MP especially for people in that position, though of course you're then have to prove that you didn't have a connection with a geographical constituency, which could be just as hard.

3. Whatever judgement one might make on '2', it is clear that the law does make provision for people of no fixed address being accepted on the electoral roll. Local authorities which contrive to subvert this are, by my reckoning, guilty of maladministration.

Agreed.
 

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
As I have allready stated. If you have lived at a residential address in the UK with a registered post code. You can register to vote as long as you have not been away from that address for more than 15 years. Look it it up it is in the rules and regulations for voters. Try google. //www.gov.uk/register-to-vote this is the site.

It looks as if that applies for overseas votes. I don't think you get the choice of any constituency in which you have lived over the past fifteen years if you are a UK resident, do you?
 
Top