sarabande
Well-Known Member
I was concerned that in recent posts there's a presumption that it is "illegal" to fire off old flares in order to get rid of them.
The only legislation I can find is:
The Merchant Shipping (Distress Signals and Prevention of Collisions) Regulations 1996
" Signals of distress
3.—(1) The signals of distress which shall be used by vessels to which regulation 2(1)(a) of these Regulations apply are those set out in Annex IV to the International Regulations.
(2) No signal of distress shall be used by any vessel unless the master of the vessel so orders.
(3) The master shall not order any signal of distress to be used by his vessel unless he is satisfied—
(a) that his vessel is in serious and imminent danger, or that another ship or an aircraft or person is in serious and imminent danger and cannot send that signal; and
(b) that the vessel in danger (whether his own vessel or another vessel) or the aircraft or person in danger, as the case may be, requires immediate assistance in addition to any assistance then available.
(4) The master of a vessel which has sent any signal of distress by means of radio or other means shall cause that signal to be revoked by all appropriate means as soon as he is satisfied that the vessel or aircraft to which or the person to whom the signal relates is no longer in need of assistance as aforesaid."
That's all pretty clear, if cumbersome, but what if someone lets of a flare ASHORE ? The Merchant Shipping (Distress Signals and Prevention of Collisions) Regulations 1996 provisions cannot be applicable, under those circumstance, and if it is really a question of stamping out the practice, what other legislation can be used ?
Possibly:
Wasting police time - section 5(2) Criminal Law Act 1967
or
False alarms of fire - s.49 Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004
I note that nationally, over the past six years, RNLI volunteers have been called out to an average of 36 false alarms each October and November period, due to irresponsible use of red and orange distress flares. <span style="color:red"> </span> <span style="color:red"> </span>
The only legislation I can find is:
The Merchant Shipping (Distress Signals and Prevention of Collisions) Regulations 1996
" Signals of distress
3.—(1) The signals of distress which shall be used by vessels to which regulation 2(1)(a) of these Regulations apply are those set out in Annex IV to the International Regulations.
(2) No signal of distress shall be used by any vessel unless the master of the vessel so orders.
(3) The master shall not order any signal of distress to be used by his vessel unless he is satisfied—
(a) that his vessel is in serious and imminent danger, or that another ship or an aircraft or person is in serious and imminent danger and cannot send that signal; and
(b) that the vessel in danger (whether his own vessel or another vessel) or the aircraft or person in danger, as the case may be, requires immediate assistance in addition to any assistance then available.
(4) The master of a vessel which has sent any signal of distress by means of radio or other means shall cause that signal to be revoked by all appropriate means as soon as he is satisfied that the vessel or aircraft to which or the person to whom the signal relates is no longer in need of assistance as aforesaid."
That's all pretty clear, if cumbersome, but what if someone lets of a flare ASHORE ? The Merchant Shipping (Distress Signals and Prevention of Collisions) Regulations 1996 provisions cannot be applicable, under those circumstance, and if it is really a question of stamping out the practice, what other legislation can be used ?
Possibly:
Wasting police time - section 5(2) Criminal Law Act 1967
or
False alarms of fire - s.49 Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004
I note that nationally, over the past six years, RNLI volunteers have been called out to an average of 36 false alarms each October and November period, due to irresponsible use of red and orange distress flares. <span style="color:red"> </span> <span style="color:red"> </span>