Trundlebug
Well-Known Member
OK, let's go with the "Equivalent to the wear of 30 normal starts". Modern cars have two year service intervals, in that time a car will be started 1500 to 2000 times, let's be generous and say 1500. A service, without pre-filling the filter imposes the same wear as 30 of those starts. So, 50 services imposes the same wear as starting the car normally between two services (two years). So you'd need to service the car for 100 years to impose the same wear as starting it normally for 2 years.
Either way, all the bearing surfaces are still coated with oil, it's not like you're starting it with dry surfaces. If there was any merit at all in pre-filling filters manufacturers would insist on it, now we have 100,000 mile warranties etc.
If you are happy to waste your time doing it, that's your choice. But, please don't say that professionals fail to do it because of the time it takes and that they don't care. Some don't care, some of us do.
Paul,
I wasn't intending to be derogatory about professionals, just realistic.
FYI the OP was talking about KAD43's, i.e. boats not cars. Different service intervals and usage pattern.
I've no idea what the stats are, but you cannot deny that the longer an engine runs without oil pressure, the more wear takes place.
Yes, they're clearly designed to withstand normal starting and quite probably will be fine if the oil filters aren't pre-filled. As I said (or at least implied) in my first post I believe.
However, for those who really want to minimise engine wear it is good practice to pre-fill. Logic. Especially in older boats with older engines - which are already worn to some extent, and may not be specified with the latest fully synthetic oils with "magnatec" type surface clinging friction reducer additives etc.