Explain to me about circuit breakers

oilybilge

Active member
Joined
3 Nov 2017
Messages
137
Visit site
I'm installing a 500w Lofrans X1 windlass. They recommend fitting a 35 amp circuit breaker.

Can this be right? By my calculations the motor will be pulling around 40 amps under normal use, so wouldn't the CB be tripping the whole time?

Or is there something I'm not understanding here? Cheers!
 

noelex

Well-known member
Joined
2 Jul 2005
Messages
4,793
Visit site
The current rating does sound slightly lower than I would expect, but I would use the manufacturer’s recommended value.

The wattage rating of windlass motors is a very nominal number. Often they will draw significantly more power near their maximum rated pulling capacity, but significant less much of the time.

Most circuit protection is simply designed to protect the wiring in a fault (short circuit) situation. Windlass circuit breakers are one of the few exceptions. These are designed to trip before the windlass motor overheats. The motors are not continually rated. For this reason it is important to use the correct value and trip curve.
 

Gsailor

...
Joined
30 Sep 2022
Messages
1,337
Visit site
24 minute video ...

I was once told by a child that videos had to be over 10 minutes to be able to be monetised- has it now increased to 24 minutes?

I was told that some years ago- the 10 minute rule I mean - the child would now be an adult !

I do appreciate the link by the forum member however ... I love to learn -I am only grumbling because I just watched a video by La Vagabond - a sailing video couple that was also 24 minutes approx - they used to be 10 minutes maximum.

24 minutes can be a long time for a video - short films on tv can be of similar duration - made with a professional crew - I reserve judgement upon the circuit breaker video because I had to switch off for a while - it may be that the 24 minutes is totally justified... it will certainly be more beneficial than the awful La Vagabond sailing video (that I skipped through a lot, because I was not going to watch 24 minutes of their video I am sorry to say).
 

Neeves

Well-known member
Joined
20 Nov 2011
Messages
13,104
Location
Sydney, Australia.
Visit site
24 minute video ...

I was once told by a child that videos had to be over 10 minutes to be able to be monetised- has it now increased to 24 minutes?

I was told that some years ago- the 10 minute rule I mean - the child would now be an adult !

I do appreciate the link by the forum member however ... I love to learn -I am only grumbling because I just watched a video by La Vagabond - a sailing video couple that was also 24 minutes approx - they used to be 10 minutes maximum.

24 minutes can be a long time for a video - short films on tv can be of similar duration - made with a professional crew - I reserve judgement upon the circuit breaker video because I had to switch off for a while - it may be that the 24 minutes is totally justified... it will certainly be more beneficial than the awful La Vagabond sailing video (that I skipped through a lot, because I was not going to watch 24 minutes of their video I am sorry to say).
Similarly

I was once told by an editor (sailing magazines - and no-one whom anyone will know) to write my articles as if for a 12 year old.

Jonathan
 

Alex_Blackwood

Well-known member
Joined
19 May 2003
Messages
1,853
Location
Fareham
Visit site
The current rating does sound slightly lower than I would expect, but I would use the manufacturer’s recommended value.

The wattage rating of windlass motors is a very nominal number. Often they will draw significantly more power near their maximum rated pulling capacity, but significant less much of the time.

Most circuit protection is simply designed to protect the wiring in a fault (short circuit) situation. Windlass circuit breakers are one of the few exceptions. These are designed to trip before the windlass motor overheats. The motors are not continually rated. For this reason it is important to use the correct value and trip curve.
You are of course correct in what you say. However, being a bit, well quite a lot, pedantic. Technically a circuit breaker won't protect against overheating. The thermal/ magnetic or hydraulic/magnetic circuit breakers, commonly used for windlasses, will protect against overcurrent and faults such as short circuits. If a non continuously rated motor, eg 20 minutes FLC is run at say, 75% FLC for an extended time it will not trip the breaker but it will overheat and possibly burn out the motor. At which stage it will probable trip. Too late!:( Sorry if that is nit picking and possibly a bit confusing but just trying to clarify.
 
Last edited:

B27

Well-known member
Joined
26 Jul 2023
Messages
2,068
Visit site
You are of course correct in what you say. However, being a bit, well quite a lot, pedantic. Technically a circuit breaker won't protect against overheating. The thermal/ magnetic or hydraulic/magnetic circuit breakers, commonly used for windlasses, will protect against overcurrent and faults such as short circuits. If a non continuously rated motor, eg 20 minutes FLC is run at say, 75% FLC for an extended time it will not trip the breaker but it will overheat and possibly burn out the motor. At which stage it will probable trip. Too late!:( Sorry if that is nit picking and possibly a bit confusing but just trying to clarify.
I don't think that's entirely true.
A carefully sized circuit breaker with the right 'curve' can often be made to trip before a motor suffers damage.

Unlikely to be 'complete protection' but often a useful level of protection from extended overload or stalling.

So I would suggest following the manufacturer's guidance is a good starting point.
 

PaulRainbow

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2016
Messages
17,055
Location
Suffolk
Visit site
I don't think that's entirely true.
A carefully sized circuit breaker with the right 'curve' can often be made to trip before a motor suffers damage.

Unlikely to be 'complete protection' but often a useful level of protection from extended overload or stalling.

So I would suggest following the manufacturer's guidance is a good starting point.
That's all correct, which is why the Quick breaker "appears" to be to low a current.
 

noelex

Well-known member
Joined
2 Jul 2005
Messages
4,793
Visit site
I agree it is not perfect protection, but the principle of selecting the value and trip curve of the breaker to prevent the windlass overheating is sound.

An example may make the reasoning clearer. Below is a graph of current vs pull for my windlass. This windlass is nominally rated at 2000w at 24v and the manufacturer recomends a 135A breaker. I have also posted a typical breaker trip curve below.

At full load the graph below shows that my windlass will draw 450A (over 9kW o_O). The trip curve of the breaker shows it will withstand this current for around 6 seconds. At around 270A the windlass will pull about 2/3 of its maximum load and the breaker will trip in about 20 seconds.

At 135A my windlass will pull about 1/4 of its rated load and at this current the breaker will never trip.

If Maxwell have done their sums and practical tests correctly, my windlass is continually rated at 1/4 the maximum load. It can pull at 2/3 the maximum load for around 20 seconds and the full maximum rated load for around 6 seconds before overheating. If this was not the case, Maxwell would have recommended a smaller breaker. This would reduce the run times before the breaker trips. If the motor was more resistant to overheating, Maxwell would have recommend a larger breaker and this would increase the run times at the various loads.

So a breaker can be selected with a value and a trip curve that will protect the windlass from overheating over a wide range of loads. While this is not a perfect system, it works well in practice with few reports of motor damage from overheating, but you need to follow the manufacturer’s guidelines for this system to work.
6108A7F7-549A-4118-A3F1-9DA408924F25.jpeg82823A3C-69FA-4AA8-A9A1-879E0C99954D.jpeg
 

oilybilge

Active member
Joined
3 Nov 2017
Messages
137
Visit site
Wow ... complicated. Thanks, guys! I knew I could rely on you.

One of the reasons I was asking is that the CB recommended by Lofrans costs £118.

OTOH if it's protecting the motor as well as the wiring then I'm thinking it's just a case of 'suck it up'. I wouldn't feel confident about choosing an alternative, no matter how many graphs I stare at.

Cheers!
 

PaulRainbow

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2016
Messages
17,055
Location
Suffolk
Visit site
Wow ... complicated. Thanks, guys! I knew I could rely on you.

One of the reasons I was asking is that the CB recommended by Lofrans costs £118.

OTOH if it's protecting the motor as well as the wiring then I'm thinking it's just a case of 'suck it up'. I wouldn't feel confident about choosing an alternative, no matter how many graphs I stare at.

Cheers!
Cheaper if you do a Google search for the part number lofrans 187331
 
Top