Epilogue-Shaft Alignment

miket

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 Jun 2001
Messages
2,008
Location
N Hampshire
Visit site
Following on from my posting a few weeks ago where I broke a flexible coupling on one engine, without hitting anything, and concluded that it was caused, probably, by engine/ shaft mis-alignment, and resulted in a bent shaft (top end) a broken casting on the end of the gearbox, plus....

I have submitted an insurance claim, yet to be determined, and following investigations by the assessor, and the coupling being returned to the manufacturer for comment, the likely cause may be different to our initial thoughts.

The boat is a Broom 37, 1992 with Volvo TAMD61A's (306hp).
The coupling manufacturer made 2 observations:
1. Wear in 3 of the 6 holes (elongated) on an adaptor plate, joining flexible coupling to gearbox indicated that these 3 bolts had been loose and eventually broke, at which point the rest decided it was all too much.
2. The flexible coupling fitted was a little under (10%) their acceptable tolerances. They admitted that their tolerances were very conservative and based on use by commercial fishing boats.

I would venture to suggest that in the light of my experience, fortunately all of which happened at low speed and not the 20+kts we were doing 10 minutes earlier, it may be worth checking, or having checked, the bolts securing your flexible couplings. Generally speaking, all reasonably current inboard powered boats have them.

I would like to thank Broom Boats (Andrew Stone) who couriered a replacement coupling to me in Belgium within 24 hrs of my asking. Also, a short and rather stout engineer in Nieuwpoort, called Mr Vandeweghe, who with his friend Chritian, somewhat less stout and able to squat in the back of the Broom's engine bay for about 3 or 4 hours, who put everything back together again the day that the coupling arrived. (unfortunately to little avail, as the shaft was bent sufficiently for him to advise only using for close quarters handling).
Hopefully, Haven Knox-Johnston, for at least contributing a large part of the repair cost!
 
I will be interested to hear how your insurance claim goes as it sounds like they may come back and try to pin it on fair wear and tear. Also if the shaft was misaligned, do Broom have any residual liability? I suppose not after nine years.

Interestingly, even though you had to replace the shaft anyway, you were lucky you could get the coupling off the top of the shaft. The rubber gaiters at the top of the shafts on my boat were perished and required replacing. No amount of persuasion would shift the couplings, including the application of heavy duty hydraulic pullers and heat. We ended up having to cut the ends off the shafts couplings and all. Result - two new couplings, new shafts, new cutlass bearings, etc. All for a couple of quids worth of rubber!

Nick
 
Re: Loadsa work to fit £1.50 rubber part

On all cases where there is a rubber bit that needs much disassembly to thread it on, including alternator (etc) drive belts if there's power take-off machinery like hydraulic pumps installed outboard of the belt, always fit a couple of extra rubber bits and leave them just dangling if possible. Then when the main one gives up you cut it off with a knife and just slide the new one along and fit that. No disassembly needed. Wont necessarily work every time but nothing to lose.

JFM
 
Re: Loadsa work to fit £1.50 rubber part

These are the rubber hoses encircling the top of the stern tube just at the stern gland. They are tapped to allow water injection so that the gland does not run hot/dry. They appear to be basically similar to radiator hose and secured by several jubilee clips at either end.

To replace you have to draw the shafts. To draw the shafts to have to get the couplings off.........!!! I see what you are decribing but it would not work in this situation.

I'm having to work for two extra years to pay for it all!

Nick
 
Top