pcatterall
Well-Known Member
Engine intake noise reduction- some tests
There has been some discussion aboutreducing the noise of marine engines by reduce the noise around theair intake.
One particular engine discussed was thePerkins 4108 many of which have no air box or filter fitted.
There have been quotes suggesting thatreductions of up to 8 decibels at cruising revs can be achievedequating to a real world situation where the noise from a heavy lorrybecomes equal to a quiet car!!
I decided to test some of the ideasusing an Eberspacher d4 heater which was set up on my bench
( clearly not a 4108 but some of theprinciples will apply!!)
I used a noise level indicator app onmy tablet to measure the noise so accuracy may be suspect but theindicated differences were my main interest.
My measurements are below
Ambient noise levels in shed 33db (outside 40db) Building is a well insulated brick built 'shed'
1) Near the heater no exhaust orintake silencers 60db
Conclusion.....The inlet noise isconsiderable being, in this case the same as the non-silencedexhaust.
Fitting a long inlet hose moves aconsiderable sound source away from the engine though only to the endof the hose.
The official silencer has a realreduction in noise in the order of 3db.
Other observations.
People have commented that the long airinlet pipe will require sound insulation but other measurements weremade around the mouth of and then down the length of the pipe whichindicated that most of the noise generated was close to the sides andfront of the inlet mouth.
I also measured effects on the exhaustside of the heater
I wonder if the end of a long inlethose could be sited where the noise was less intrusive?
I wonder ( and will experiment) if abetter ( funnel?) shaped 'nose' on the inlet pipe would reduceturbulence around the mouth of the inlet pipe.
Clearly this is not a very comprehensive or accurate test but the figures are better than 'just impressions' and may stimulate some informed debate.
What else does one do on a wet bank holiday sunday!!??
There has been some discussion aboutreducing the noise of marine engines by reduce the noise around theair intake.
One particular engine discussed was thePerkins 4108 many of which have no air box or filter fitted.
There have been quotes suggesting thatreductions of up to 8 decibels at cruising revs can be achievedequating to a real world situation where the noise from a heavy lorrybecomes equal to a quiet car!!
I decided to test some of the ideasusing an Eberspacher d4 heater which was set up on my bench
( clearly not a 4108 but some of theprinciples will apply!!)
I used a noise level indicator app onmy tablet to measure the noise so accuracy may be suspect but theindicated differences were my main interest.
My measurements are below
Ambient noise levels in shed 33db (outside 40db) Building is a well insulated brick built 'shed'
1) Near the heater no exhaust orintake silencers 60db
- Near the heater with exhaust hose ( led outside) 55db
- As above but with 5 feet of inlet hose fitted 50db
- At the inlet end of the inlet hose 54db
- As in 2 above and with the 'official' Eberspacher inlet silencer fitted 50db
- At the inlet end of the official inlet silencer 53db
Conclusion.....The inlet noise isconsiderable being, in this case the same as the non-silencedexhaust.
Fitting a long inlet hose moves aconsiderable sound source away from the engine though only to the endof the hose.
The official silencer has a realreduction in noise in the order of 3db.
Other observations.
People have commented that the long airinlet pipe will require sound insulation but other measurements weremade around the mouth of and then down the length of the pipe whichindicated that most of the noise generated was close to the sides andfront of the inlet mouth.
I also measured effects on the exhaustside of the heater
- exhaust off inlet pipes off 60db
- exhaust off inlet pipe on 58db ( looks small but significant)
- mouth of exhaust ( outside building) 60db then with steel silencer 56db (felt like more)
I wonder if the end of a long inlethose could be sited where the noise was less intrusive?
I wonder ( and will experiment) if abetter ( funnel?) shaped 'nose' on the inlet pipe would reduceturbulence around the mouth of the inlet pipe.
Clearly this is not a very comprehensive or accurate test but the figures are better than 'just impressions' and may stimulate some informed debate.
What else does one do on a wet bank holiday sunday!!??
