email from No 10

sailorman

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 May 2003
Messages
78,996
Location
temp ashore, i expect to be back🤞
Visit site
Friday 27 November 2009
RNLI-RF-licences - epetition response

We received a petition asking:

“We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to protect the RNLI from paying licence fees for using Maritime radio frequencies.”

Details of Petition:

“As reported in the Sunday Telegraph on the 28th September 2008, Ofcom wants to bring “market forces” into the maritime and aviation communications. The RNLI will have to pay £250,000 a year, and “smaller search and rescue charities fear they may have to close”. This proposal must be rejected wholeheartedly.”

· Read the petition
· Petitions homepage
Read the Government’s response

Following last year’s consultation, in August 2009 Ofcom published further proposals for spectrum pricing in the maritime sector. Those relevant to the RNLI and other safety-of-life charities were:

* Radio channels used by search and rescue organisations (including the RNLI) in the course of maritime emergencies are managed by HM Coastguard. These are shared channels and we will not be asking any individual rescue organisations to pay fees.
* In addition, we are proposing to make available, free of charge, a new channel (possibly two) to be shared by search and rescue organisations for routine, non emergency, communications. We have invited rescue organisations to say whether this would be helpful to them.
* Finally, where any charity, whose sole or main objective is the safety of human life in an emergency, requires a radio channel for its exclusive use, we are proposing that fees should continue to be discounted by 50%. Larger organisations which operate from multiple sites will also benefit from new “area defined licences” which permit an unlimited number of transmitters in the licensed area; these will often be much cheaper than today’s licences.

Full details of the consultation, which is set to close on 11 December 2009, are available on the Ofcom website (www.ofcom.org.uk). On completion of this consultation, Ofcom will publish a concluding statement.
 
the sting is in the last para. 50% for charities involved in saving human life....there's generous for you.

St John Ambulance
Red Cross
St Andrews Cross
Mountain Rescue

...
 
the sting is in the last para. 50% for charities involved in saving human life....there's generous for you.

St John Ambulance
Red Cross
St Andrews Cross
Mountain Rescue

...

OK - but how many of these organisations need a channel for their exclusive use? I know nothing about Mountain Rescue, for example, but do they have their own channel?
 
I dont think much of this on two grounds.

Firstly I dont see why the RNLI and indeed every other agency shouldn't pay their way. They pay exactly the same as everyone else for things like fuel or food or clothing - why expect just the government not to operate that way? And of course it begs the question of where do you stop. For example, should plod get radio frequencies free. What about the district nurse or midwife? What about the mechanic who repairs the district nurse's essential car? Or the man who repairs traffic lights? The man from the H&SE?

The second reason is the cost. You might think that its just the money for licences which is forgone and maybe if it was, then it wouldnt be too bad. Instead we have a system with exceptions. Which means civil servants to control the exceptions. Managers to manage the civil servants who control the exceptions. HR staff to ..... etc etc.

Government is far too complicated and expensive to administer as it is. Arguably the best solution would be to let everyone have the frequencies for free (after all the goverbnment doesnt and cant own the ether), and get rid of the Ofcom and civil service staff who administer the whole thing. Plus the managers plus the HR staff etc etc.
 
Top