RupertW
Well-known member
Well that’s not what the manufacturers say. I am certainly holding off until I start to see all the enthusiasts with new LFP replacing them - until then we don’t know how quickly LFPs are degrading under the kind of use that the manufacturers warn against. If I’m still holding off in 5 years or so when my 2 year old FLAs will need replacing then it will be clear that although the lifetime cost of LFPs versus FLASs is far higher then the lifespan makes the convenience worth it.You're not really comparing like for like there.
It's virtually impossible to use FLA without degrading them. Everything you do shortens their life, by varying degrees. The data sheets for deep cycle batteries tend to show a direct correlation between DOD and cycles. But there is no usage pattern that is sustainable indefinitely.
For LFP, you can use the whole 0-100% range and you will still get hundreds of cycles. There is absolutely no need to stop charging at 80%, you just don't want to leave them sitting at 100% for a long time. If you're using the system daily them obviously that won't be able to happen.
Going below 20% will affect the number of cycles you can get, but it's still going to be several thousand, and way, way more than even the most pampered lead acid.
Until then almost everybody is abusing their new batteries but nobody is sure whether that matters to the hoped for longer lifespans.