mikegunn
Well-Known Member
It could be that the first cm is actually a cm that has been divided Into nine equal parts. But how does one check? Your post brings many thoughts to mind. If measurement is to work universally we all need to sing from the same song sheet, and that to be traceable to a single standard. When we buy a new rule, steel or otherwise we tend to accept on face value that it will be reasonably accurate and it probably won’t come with a certificate of conformance either. So how do any of us ensure that our measuring instruments are correct? I confess that these days I don’t, although in a former life I kept a 1” slip block as a reference. I once worked for a large engineering company which had a significant workforce employed in a metrology department, giving quality assurance to all measuring instruments.Call me an idiot for not noticing immediately ! The steel ruler I have been using for a couple of weeks now has 1 mm missing from the front end. Looking for a replacement, some of the images on the listings actually show identical faults perfectly clearly, if you bother to zoom in.
No guarantee, of course, about the set I have just ordered , which look fine in the ad.
.View attachment 96181
I think I have got away with my gross inattention though. I check thicknesses further up the ruler, and from memory the only butt-ending I have done is when initially setting the fence on the band-saw, before a trial on some scrap wood.
Mike